They have some chance if they wrote code to find a counterexample to some obscure math conjecture

Maybe. I don’t know at which point all that extra processing stops being worth it.

They also want nuclear fusion reactors and there is none in the horizon after 50 years of research and development (even though many want to sell the idea that there are).

You can start preparing for post hypercomputation cryptography too if you believe your argument.

It’s not going to happen this century, probably never

Like allowing a federated system instead of a central one, not depending in external libraries and services, and so on. I bet there are many things that would actually improve the security instead of this that is more of a marketing point.

Lol, it shows the hype quantum computing has sold and how detached the public thought is about it from reality.

I’m friends with two quantum computing researchers and they are pretty sure quantum computing will never be a practical application because of how the noise and errors scale with the system size.

Having in mind we are not even close to breaking classical cryptography with quantum computing I doubt this was their best investment of time

Cats will never work. Abolish work.

That’s a hefty chonker

It can also arc with the wall of the microwave

Nuclear, chemical and biological weapons? Starvation? Taking hostages? If they weren’t effective why would countries use them?

Many war crimes are also very effective strategies. So you are okay with them?

Did I just invented the concept of open borders? Where is my Nobel price? So many international organizations asking for it and I’m the first one to articulate the definition.

According to UN yes, but that’s a pretty low standard. I’m talking about real democratic values.

Also how are you going to leave your country if every other country is blocking you off?

Required by whom? I don’t care about practicality. Slavery is much more practical than having everyone be free, so I guess that’s okay too.

It’s a human right. To be a democracy you need to already have all human rights codified in your legislation.

If you can’t use logic to justify it, then it’s the same as to just having a feeling for it

It’s completely different stopping a country having a representation in some international contest than to strip away people from the right to move because the were born in a specific place.

You both are pieces of shit.

That’s not true. Most moral decisions are subconscious, they feel right to you or come as intuition.

To apply logic first you need some axioms or principles, and that decision can’t be done by logic as it falls outside of it.

The fuck is this racist comment?