Avatar by eveoart. Artwork - Artist

  • 0 Posts
  • 55 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • IronKrill@lemmy.catoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldIs this safe to use?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m using Gluetun via Docker Compose as well right now and can happily say all the ports exposed via the ports: setting are local network only. I could port forward them via the router probably (haven’t tried) but I only use them for access via LAN. To expose ports over the VPN connection you use the FIREWALL_VPN_INPUT_PORTS environment variable. A stripped version of my current compose (example port numbers, not real) with LAN access to 6000 and WAN access to 1234 and 5678:

    services:
      gluetun:
        image: qmcgaw/gluetun:latest
        restart: unless-stopped
        container_name: gluetun
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN # in the default compose file i dunno what this does tbh
        environment:
          - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
          - VPN_TYPE=openvpn
          - OPENVPN_VERSION=<redacted>
          - OPENVPN_USER=<redacted>
          - OPENVPN_PASSWORD=<redacted>
          - OPENVPN_CUSTOM_CONFIG=/gluetun/custom.ovpn
          - FIREWALL_VPN_INPUT_PORTS=1234,5678 # allows ports through VPN connection
          - FIREWALL_OUTBOUND_SUBNETS=192.168.0.0/24 # I found that I needed this for certain LAN access
        ports:
          - 6000:6000 # port i access via LAN
        volumes:
          - /mnt/example/config.ovpn:/gluetun/custom.ovpn
    

  • Trump’s unreasonable nature is so obvious in the full video that I don’t see how anyone with two braincells can be on his side. Some highlights I want to share:

    Reporter asks at 37:39 “… and who would protect those minerals … ?” Trump: “They’ll be protected. The agreement will protect them. The agreement, yeah we’re signing an agreement.” Reporter: “Right but what if Russia tries to invade or there’s russian agression in those spots.” Trump: “I just don’t think that’s going to happen.” He then deflects by trying to discredit the reporter since he couldn’t answer the question. So instead of giving Ukraine any guarantees or acknowledging Russia’s previous deceit, he hand waves it away.

    At 33:45 “… what did [Putin] tell you that he wanted peace?”. Trump: “My whole life is deals … I’ve known him for a long time, he had to suffer through the Russia hoax, you know Russia Russia Russia it was a hoax. It was all Biden it was nothing to do with him … I think that he wants to make a deal and he would like to see it end.” What an absolute nothing answer. He’s asked why he believes this is viable and after a short attempt at making Russia the victim he just says, rephrased, “because, lol”.

    At 39:50 Vance goes on a truly incoherent ramble about how Biden tried “thumping [his] chest and pretending that the president of the United States words mattered more than the President of the United States’s actions” and thus “the path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe in engaging in diplomacy”. Ah, diplomacy, the path that is famously known for it’s lack of words… sending money to Ukraine or providing military aid? Those aren’t actions, they’re just words. Zelensky goes on to ELI5 to Vance how Putin broke diplomacy before the clips everyone is posting begins.

    And just for fun, at 30:15 Trump delivers a line so stupid it almost breaks Zelensky’s poker face: “I’ve stopped wars, I’ve stopped many wars. My people will tell you, I’ve stopped wars that nobody ever heard about. I stopped wars before they ever started. … I could give you a lot of nations that would tell you right now they were probably going to war — I could tell you right now there is a nation thinking about going to war on something that nobody in this room has ever even heard about.”

    This is ignoring all the times they try and blame Biden for Russia invading Ukraine which just ???




  • “We’ve spent two years requiring our apps from the ground up to boost our development speed, which should enable us to bring new features to you more efficiently, across more platforms,”

    … “and that’s why we’re deleting a bunch of features never to bring them back. Because we’re just so efficient!” Crazy how many companies use this awful excuse.

    Also is that a misquote by the author or did they really write “requiring”?





  • I’m going to disagree on this one, I’ve seem far too many comments, especially from LW users, along the lines of “I can’t be bothered to change websites because I’m already settled in.” Most people are attached to their posts and content and consider moving instance as “losing progress”. And the bigger an instance is the harder it’ll be to leave if they ever pull something seriously “power trippy” that could lock off content to some people, because there will be a large mass of communities and posts on that instance.