I would totally buy that and have every intention of eating it, but wouldn’t ever seem to “get around to it”, yet I also wouldn’t really be able to account for what I was doing to prevent me from “getting around to it”.

They got there too late to be a primary influence, but Trump won’t ever say no to a hand out.

I like the idea of a “Russian Nesting Doll” response thread of seemingly infinite, independent archives…

Archive of article.

When something like a hat may actually cost you an arm and a leg.

I mean, at least one Nuclear Safety Technician is advertising his number in local TV ads.

Otherwise, just look up the number for 742 Evergreen Terrace—how hard is that?

Can we change it to “In-sea-curity”?

Or just “The Sea of Insecurity”?

Or maybe “Man Baby Bay”

Or “Weak Little Pussy removed President Tiny Hands Dumb Dumb Deep Water Douche Lagoon”

Or, like, “The Gulf of Mexico”…

Politics aside, this photo really makes her look like a super villain.

Refill with an adapter from a larger propane tank.

The refilled tanks can’t hold as much, but it works.

They can hold a bit more if you toss them in the freezer for a while before attempting to refill.

Removed by mod

#### Hux [@[email protected]](https://lemmy.ml/u/Hux)

-----------------

I’d say I go to see a movie in an actual movie theater once a year, but the truth is I probably go half as often as that.

It isn’t that I am not interested in movies, I just don’t see the value. I am supposed to pay for a ticket, concessions, and whatever goes into travel to the theater to watch a movie with a bunch of (probably annoying) strangers in a fairly gross environment?

My guess is my annual box office contribution is approximately 0.5x the current ticket price.

If, however, there was a $20/month subscription service which would let me watch new releases at home, I would subscribe.

Even if it was relegated to expensive hardware, like an Apple Vision Pro, I would very likely buy the device and sign up for the subscription.

$240/year would be a hell of a lot more revenue than my current $5.50/year—regardless of whether or not it would be exclusive to certain hardware or platforms.

Honestly, my current TV and sound system may not be as impressive as a theater, but they are good and I’d take that experience over the modified bus depot experience of a public movie theater.

Part of their service is to allow sellers to suppress higher discount codes from appearing in the honey service. That just flat-out contradicts what they tell consumers to convince them to download the extension.

I was expecting Honey to offer the smaller discount codes to the consumer, then apply the higher (hidden) discount count code to the seller and pocket the difference.

In some ways, it almost seems like what they are doing is worse than that—just playing both sides for their own gain.

I’m interested in what comes in part 2.

It does look like that frog from that one Simpsons episode.

Went ahead and watched the entire show—it was a really entertaining performance.

This revolution needs to get real French, real fast…

Those who profit from the status quo are the same who could have that information consolidated for review. They also know that maintaining your apathy is central to their business model.

If they have created a system by which they can profit immensely, but that profit could be taken away by the masses at anytime, the last thing they will do is enable you to care.

Your comment shows that they have been successful in tricking you into not only not caring, but actually advocating against your own interests.

This

He’s like an X-Men hero designed to find Ant-Man when he gets stuck between couch cushions or something.

Eating? No, of course not.

Look at this as the bat-world’s equivalent of that that Piper Perri meme.