Forbo

Carcinization calls. Return to crab.

Oof. That sucks.

Time to fork the meme.

It’s also self-reinforcing, by making that the norm it then shapes future development and expectations. :-\

Asymmetric bandwidth is literally designed to ensure you remain a consumer and is actively inhibiting the collaborative, communal web utopia we were told was going to be the future.

Pete Ashdown’s a badass. Big up XMission.

Depends. Commuting is dumb, I would rather have robust public transit. But night driving and blasting music while looking out over the city lights is pretty dope.

If the link was unique to the email, then it could be a signal to the phisher that is a valid address for further targeting.

“C’mon you guys! There it is right in front of you the whole time. You’re dereferencing a null pointer! Open your eyes!”

What’s with the “but six” part?

It rounds the browser window to the nearest 100x100 window size. Using the default will likely be the biggest dataset to hide yourself in, but maximizing the window will still have some amount of obfuscation.

Letterboxing has significantly reduced threat presented by window sizing. https://support.torproject.org/glossary/letterboxing/

Pseudonymous, not anonymous. It’s a little difference, but one that can determine whether you land behind bars/dead/doxxed.

More people didn’t vote than they did for either candidate. Apathy won.

Means testing voting? What could possibly go wrong?! You do see how horrifically abusable that is, right?

Discord is surveillance capitalist garbage.

You can always give it a run and add a report. Also, if it doesn’t work, give the app devs feedback that it is preventing you from using it. It might not be much but we can at least try to make our voices heard.

Were you using sandboxed Play Services? Having multiple apps doing their own notification listeners can definitely impact battery, but I’ve not had an issue.

I laughed.

“What is this level of grand security…” Enumerated here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

Once manufacturers can implement those things, then you will have an alternative to Google hardware for running Graphene. I’m not telling people to trust anything, don’t put words in my mouth.

Who is PrivacyPhones and why should I believe they are in any way affiliated with Graphene?

GrapheneOS has defined a set of security standards for their operating system which have hardware requirements. These standards have been published and there have been efforts to engage with hardware manufacturers to adopt the required hardware. Blame the manufacturers for skimping on security, rather than Graphene being unwilling to compromising their values.

I wouldn’t because I am not a dev. I stay in my wheelhouse and don’t try to pitch features as something they aren’t.