This.
I support AI, but I don’t understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.
OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, “Well I have a PhD! Checkmate.”
We’d descend into a dark age for science.
Experts often disagree.
If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn’t need so much research or so many universities.
I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.
But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.
Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.
Many people with PhD’s have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.
A PhD doesn’t make you infallible.
I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I’m correct, it’s not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it’s because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.
Yeah, both sides are wrong here.
Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.
Maybe I’m missing something, but can you explain exactly what’s wrong with this?
I’m just trying to understand where you’re coming from.
Heck yeah!
(I just learned the formatting: [email protected])
I’ll check it out! Thank you. 😌
Subscribed! Thank you. 😌
This is awesome! Thank you so much.
Thank you so much! I’ll check them out and promote my community there. 😌
LOL 😭
At least we can distance ourselves from that and create our own communities.
Oh dang, I was told it didn’t matter which instance I joined. 😭
I chose it from some join Lemmy website.
Nothing on that website or on the instance sign up page shows the settings or permissions of the instance. It would be nice to view those before signing up.