Okay? Neither are most psychiatrists. That doesn’t mean they don’t study and understand the principals of neuroscience. He cites his sources, so you can verify or debunk his claims for yourself, if you so choose.

While I do share some of her concerns with the way he blends his religious beliefs into his therapy, he’s generally pretty good about distinguishing therapy (of which there are many different forms that may or may not involve religious practices) and neuroscience. Though that might be hard to glean through carefully-selected 10-second clips.

I’m really not a fan of the way she takes a lot of his clips out of context. For example, in the Miskif interview on ADHD where he offers prayer beads, he’s not actually suggesting that Mizkif start praying or adopt a new religion; he’s offering what’s effectively a fidget toy, which is something quite commonly suggested for ADHD sufferers as sensory input often helps ADHD patients focus. Longer clip of the segment in question.

I couldn’t finish her video, though, because the constant pausing to interject her own quips made it feel like a Reddit argument where somebody argues each of your sentences in isolation instead of arguing against the whole comment. So I’m not sure where Reckful comes into play here.

To this day, I have still yet to see a single news article mentioning Uttar Pradesh that wasn’t about a raped child. I’m sure some of this is bias in the reporting, but this is literally the only thing I know about the place.

Alok Kanojia, he’s a psychiatrist who is very active on Twitch. He often does interviews with other prominent streamers and discusses mental health.

Wish she was.

It’s always projection with them. It happens so frequently that I’m no longer surprised by these sorts of stories, and why I’m always on-guard whenever I hear a conservative suggest policies around children.

He’s one of those “how can an atheist be a good person without the promise of heaven?” type of Christians. You know, the kind of Christian who can’t imagine doing the right thing just because it’s the right thing, and not because there’s a reward for it.

Now this is a top-tier shitpost.

That’s awesome! Sometimes I regret throwing out my milk crates full of old Nintendo Powers from the 90s. I miss flipping through those.

If one day YT sets a “minimum requirements” page on their website to access their content, they’ve immediately ceded market share to the next upstart. Imagine if they broke viewing for all of the countless cheap (and e-waste) phones, tablets, low end IOT devices, “smart TVs”, and so on because they place a requirement that the device cannot meet. Those users will not throw away their hardware - they’ll migrate to the first available alternative way to watch content.

This all incorrectly assumes that there exists any viable competition to switch to. YouTube ran at a net loss for over a decade to get the reach they currently have, only because Google was one of the very few companies who could feasibly afford to do so. Nobody else with the resources to compete with YouTube is willing to compete with YouTube, because of the massive cost required to get even a fraction of that user base, let alone a critical mass.

And most of the content people access YouTube for is only found on YouTube, so those hypothetical users aren’t going to switch to a new platform, they’re going to either just flat-out stop watching or will replace their devices.

Those are fantastic solutions if you don’t want anybody to watch your content.

You said it on live TV, jackass. We all saw and heard you.

made mostly of foam and wire, but painted bronze

How fitting.

Jesus fucking Christ, sports shouldn’t be a political issue at all. It’s literally a fucking game, the government and politicians shouldn’t be involved in this shit at all in the first place. We should care about as much about Kamala’s opinion on the WNBA as we do about her opinion on Minecraft. The leagues are privately-owned companies, let them run their fucking company how they want (which up to this point, has been trans-inclusive).

They confused it for Target?

The courts stopped him, at least temporarily, TBH I’ve lost track of that one.

I’ve got some bad news for you.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-trump-ftc/

The high court said in a brief order that it will also allow Mr. Trump to fire Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from her position at the FTC while it considers the case. It will hear arguments in its December session, and its stay will remain in place until it issues a decision. Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the majority’s decision to allow Slaughter’s removal.

Don’t reactivate Disney+ if you cancelled it. This needs to be a lasting blemish on their record.

Those votes don’t affect the score on the original instance, though. Other federated instances will still be able to calculate a truer score in that scenario.

Okay.

Admins should only be looking at who downvotes posts when there is some sort of history of vote-abuse happening. Somebody voicing their opinion with their votes is a perfectly valid use of the upvote/downvote system.

PTB