And it’s highly effective!
Predation accounts for a relatively low rate of nest failure: only 34% compared to an average of 80% for birds in similar habitats. This may be enabled by their well camouflaged nests, or simply the lack of local predators.
Only for male fashion. For the ladies, brown is in.
Not out of range for moral support. I’m sure there’s an alien out there having a shitty day. Like, maybe his spaceship got towed and he lost his job at the Dyson sphere. I’m rooting for you, buddy!
You’re going to regret those words when you die and face judgment before the Moth God.
Is it really worth it?
They say money can’t buy happiness, but it can buy apples, and that cat looks pretty happy to me.
I work at big tech (not MS) and yes, the comp package really is that good, though not as good as it used to be. I immediately doubled my total comp when I came here from my last job, and now it’s ~5x. I could retire right now if I wanted, so I don’t care about layoffs anymore.
Yeah, it got really popular when the Bible dropped in the 2nd century BCE. The Noah flood story was basically a copy-and-paste of the Epic of Gilgamesh. Bible nerds were annoying af.
The Epic of Gilgamesh
In a sense, AI is already fucking with everyone’s brain when it comes to mass-produced ads and propaganda.
Bad news: this article was retracted for fraud after the journal discovered the author wasn’t actually a dog.
Yoy should come join the tautology club. Just remember these three rules:
My favorite thing about tautologies is how tautological they are.
Better than creating this culinary atrocity in real life.
I’ve been on the internet for over 25 years and I’ve never seen a meme community that didn’t beat memes to death. If moth memes are enough to annoy you, you’d have an aneurysm from “you’re the man now dog” memes in the early 00s.
Perfect companion to somebody with resting bitch face.
What about AIHNPtPaNVaB (Assigned I have no plans to purchase a new vehicle at birth)?
I agree, but I’m not sure it matters when it comes to the big questions, like “what separates us from the LLMs?” Answering that basically amounts to answering “what does it mean to be human?”, which has been stumping philosophers for millennia.
It’s true that artificial neurons are significant different than biological ones, but are biological neurons what make us human? I’d argue no. Animals have neurons, so are they human? Also, if we ever did create a brain simulation that perfectly replicated someone’s brain down to the cellular level, and that simulation behaved exactly like the original, I would characterize that as a human.
It’s also true LLMs can’t learn, but there are plenty of people with anterograde amnesia that can’t either.
This feels similar to the debates about what separates us from other animal species. It used to be thought that humans were qualitatively different than other species by virtue of our use of tools, language, and culture. Then it was discovered that plenty of other animals use tools, have language, and something resembling a culture. These discoveries were ridiculed by many throughout the 20th century, even by scientists, because they wanted to keep believing humans are special in some qualitative way. I see the same thing happening with LLMs.
I don’t know how I work. I couldn’t tell you much about neuroscience beyond “neurons are linked together and somehow that creates thoughts”. And even when it comes to complex thoughts, I sometimes can’t explain why. At my job, I often lean on intuition I’ve developed over a decade. I can look at a system and get an immediate sense if it’s going to work well, but actually explaining why or why not takes a lot more time and energy. Am I an LLM?
deleted by creator