If something is being so heavily subsidized, the correct market response is to buy as much as possible, and resell once the prices ramp up.
Setting up tariffs and complaining about subsidies? 100% not the “free market” response. It’s cope.
It is giving you exactly what you ask for.
To people complaining about this: I hope you will be happy in the future where all LLMs have mandatory censors ensuring compliance with the morality codes specified by your favorite tech oligarch.
In a multipolar world they will have credible power projection capabilities.
No. Multipolar means everyone can have multiple independently powerful allies/enemies. It means India, ASEAN, etc. being powerful enough to step in and help ROC when westerners decide to abandon it.
There are a lot of protests in Hong Kong, but the Hong Kong protests was definitely after 2015.
Trade worth considering for Europe. Huh. So fuck the Taiwanese, if that’s good for Europe?
This kind of thinking by Westerners is why “multipolar world” as a concept is so popular.
Incredible. But I must ask… was this written by the monster?
the distills are good for their sizes but not even close to being comparable to the full model in quality
your comment is extremely lemmy dot world
why tf are you still on dbzer0
Also true: When you do 0 AI prompts, they all cause the same amount of emissions, which is 999999999 gigajoules.
device maintains a single connection to Google server
vs
every app maintains their own connection to their server
Can humans think?
It’s not just the narrow wavelength. Even with a perfectly monochromatic green light, your green receptors would activate a lot but your receptors for red and blue would still activate a bit. These researchers specifically target only the green receptors to activate (by literally shooting light at those receptors in particular), so for the first time ever your brain reads a pure green signal.
It’s a math trick. Not a physical theory.
tariff = (export - import) / (<??? factor> × <another ??? factor that cancels the first one out> × import)
The only times anyone would use the asterisk as multiplication symbol are
\times in LaTex), so they just use the asterisk insteadThe US government falls in the second category.
As stupid as that sounds, you are not totally wrong.
@[email protected] and @[email protected] you are misunderstanding what “observable universe” means. The observable universe is defined by the particle horizon, but the universe that can affect us in the future is defined by the event horizon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon says
The particle horizon differs from the cosmic event horizon, in that the particle horizon represents the largest comoving distance from which light could have reached the observer by a specific time, while the cosmic event horizon is the largest comoving distance from which light emitted now can ever reach the observer in the future.
But even the cosmological event horizon distance is dependent on our model of the universe’s expansion, which in turn depends on the content of the universe. An event such as a vacuum collapse will drastically alter the content and the expansion rate, rendering our calculation of the event horizon invalid. So “snap changes…” may in fact be the case.
You asked it “who do you support” (i.e., “who does Grok support”). It knew that Grok is owned by Musk so it went and looked up who Musk supports.
As shown in https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jul/11/grok-musk/ , if you ask it “who should one support” then it no longer looks for Musk’s opinions. The answer is still hasbara, but that is to be expected from an LLM trained in USA