

I once had a conversation about economics with a different person. Just something clicked in some other guy and sent them down a spiral.
I once had a conversation about economics with a different person. Just something clicked in some other guy and sent them down a spiral.
Nope, language models by inherent nature, xannot be used to calculate. Sure theoretically you could have input parsed, with proper training, to find specific variables, input those to a database and have that data mathematically transformed back into language data.
No LLMs do actual math, they only produce the most likely output to a given input based on trained data. If I input: What is 1 plus 1?
Then given the model, most likely has trained repetition on an answer to follow that being 1 + 1 = 2, that will be the output. If it was trained on data that was 1 + 1 = 5, then that would be the output.
Pick pretty much any forum.
Ah. So business as usual then I take it.
I can understand why he’d like the concept, he can’t think for himself afterall.
So would it now be considered acceptable to use something like " [INSERT FIRM] passed gas to the amount of [BLANK] tons over [PERIOD OF TIME] "
It sure would make reports a hell of alot more interesting.
Anything to stay in the news cycle.
Lmao there’s always something a little funny, in the greek sense of the word, about seeing the continuing unending appetite for further loosening of the chains on what are essentially political rabid dogs.
Sure, it’s always going to have been a goal for these, most honored gentlemen but a small sliver of my mind still has sone hope for rational thought from them. Too much an optimist I guess.
Eh.
Whats the harm in a little nuclear war here and there?
Maybe a small nuclear winter will offset all this global warming hullabaloo, keep things balanced.