Hahaha, yeah that’s the literal translation of what I said.

So to break it down: Puta - curse word, means literally prostitute, is used as an exclamation of amusement or exhaustion at a situation by itself - kinda like saying “god damn”

Salto lejos el maní - literally the peanut jumped far. Used in the same way as all the other idioms here to say mind your own business or keep it to yourself.

Puta que saltó lejos el maní

Oh… Wow.

I don’t get it…

I do believe it is some sot of CAT

If by coup you mean the rich trying to get richer, yeah the resistance worked.

The problem came afterwards, when the people were handed the power to actually change something it became a circus.

So the rich didn’t get the chance to make ridiculous changes like in the US right now. But all we were left with was status quo.

Oh yeah cause it went so well for Chile. There was a government turnover and it fragmented the political parties so much that no one can agree on anything anymore.

Oh and the new people in power are learning by improvising.

Source: I am from Chile.

Nah they’ll actually dangle the food in front of starving people to draw a crowd and then bomb them.

Fucking monsters.

This vexes me.

More beans.

I really like this response. This is how I approach it as well on a higher level.

However here we seemed to have glossed over “what is right and wrong” which is a very complex issue and might be biased by the observer.

Hobbes has touched on this subject and the whole construct of society as we know it in his book “The Leviathan”

What we might see as wrong in the case of the killer and their victims, on his end is just an expression of his free will. In his mind he might not be doing anything wrong, given different guidelines for moral or empathy. In fact he may not even consider his victims alive.

So we judge them based on our morals and views of good and evil. Are we correct or are they correct? Hobbes states that the morals of the majority are what we follow in a society. But it’s just something that we’ve constructed.

Edit: once again I’m using a case in where the situation is very obvious and clear cut. But think about when there is more nuance. A society views a certain race or species as a food source or livestock (think us and cows, or us and farmed fish) Are we correct or are we wrong to do what we do?

So let’s start with a hypothetical scenario. (I know strawman, but we’re talking about meta levels of philosophy here and experiments like these usually serve very well to prove a point or contradiction in someone’s logic)

If there is a serial killer who can never be satisfied and can escape any sort of containment given enough time. Is it wrong to execute them?

Because she is a different being than the being that was defeated.

She’s still a little bitch.

This reminds me of Hydra’s “Compliance will be rewarded”

Ya think they’ll stop buying property in the US for profit?

"I’m not the sharpest crayon in the basket. "

“Does the pope shit in the woods?”

I was looking for this :)

Meanwhile in Chilean politics…

Agreed, ai slop is stealing all the attention.

DLC Quest comes to mind. It’s not even a parody anymore 😭