• Un4@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Pure comunism sounds nice at first glance, but it also has major issues. Under comunism every one is equal, however inherently people are not equal and should be rewarded accordingly. What this leads to is that high performers are rewarded as much as lazy bums. This causes stagnation in production output as why try hard when you can chill. And as history tells us with Soviet Union, can lead to massive famines. It also creates parallel economies of bribes and favours because well connected and productive people still want to be above every one else, this gives unfair advantage mafias and criminals. As they have no moral problem abusing these parallel economies.

    In my opinion, no pure system is good if it’s comunusim or capitalism. You have to have a bit of everything like in Scandinavian countries or some Western european countries. You need to reward high performers but not too much. You need to take care of the weak and sick but do not make it that it’s not worth working. You have to allow equal access to education no matter your background so everyone has the same starting point.

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Only if there are no checks and balances. The typical “communist” regimes like Russia and China can hardly be called communist by any definition. Just like nobody would call nazi’s socialist, despite it being in their name (national socialism).

      Fucking “I take all and ya’ll better belive I’ll redistribute favorably or fucking die” is hardly even left. I especially hate when people say “in theory it makes sense, but in reality…”, no it fucking doesn’t even in theory!

      • TimeNaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        There can be no checks and balances on a state.

        States only act in a way to preserve themselves. If that means by helping the working class - so be it. If it means oppressing the working class - that’s ok too. As long as the structure and elites remain in place.

        Which is why authoritarian state communism always degenerates into a kind of state capitalism where the owner class is the state instead of capitalists. In communism there is no owner class

    • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not even really a meme… Or at least the template isn’t used properly - the guys should be saying the same thing.