• phase@lemmy.8th.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, if I understand things correctly, it may address a part of this issue indirectly: corps are responsible of what they use. If a part is open source they also have the opportunity to fix the problem themselves.

      Looks very nice to me.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Indeed, that’s why I use the AGPL license. Corporations hate it because it forces them to give back.

      • logging_strict@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        it's free as in go pound sand if you aren't going to fund maintainers

        it doesn’t force them to do anything until devs refuse to work for any company that doesn’t.

        i’m with you on agplv3+. The copyright recognition document comes before the resume.