cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that’s true or not…

  • zako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    the problem here is not the banks or apps, the problem is Google Play Integrity API, which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones and it is used to ban secured ROMs such as GrapheneOS and it allows to run apps on outdated phones without security patches.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      124
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones

      The point of the Google Play Integrity API is to ensure that the user is not in control of their phone, but that one of a small number of megacorps are in control.

      Can the user pull their data out of apps? Not acceptable. Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable. Can the user modify apps? Not acceptable.

      Basically it ensures that the user has no control over their own computing.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s used to help secure the businesses app yes. It helps with things like preventing resource abuse which would cost the company money. E.g. querying mass amounts of data on a loop to increase the companies bill.

      • zako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you install GrapheneOS, you do not need root, so GrapheneOS is in control of the phone not the user. The key here is if GrapheneOS is secure enough to be certified by Google Play Integrity API. is it security or other issue? perhaps Google is not supporter of FOSS ROMs, perhaps it is not fun of how GrapheneOS removes permissions to Google Apps, …

        If it is not security, this is a kind of monopoly to control which ROMs are allowed to run apps.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable

        This is possible on any Android phone, no root or custom rom required

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Oh, the banks and regulators are to blame. Especially in Europe.

      Find me a PSD2 bank bank that doesn’t require a phone number

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          So the Play Integrity API is literally why I moved to iOS. My bank apps didn’t work with Lineage and the stock OnePlus ROM just sucked ass after the ColorOS or whatever update. I figured I might as well go iOS if I can’t have a custom ROM anyway, and so far it has indeed been a much nicer experience than stock Android. If you can’t TRULY customize everything, might as well at least get stability and consistency out of it, right? Plus at the time, there wasn’t a single Android OEM out there with truly long OS update support.

          Anyway, if this succeeds and custom ROMs are considered to have sound integrity, I might just move back to Android. Graphene seems cool, I haven’t tried it yet because I’ve never owned a Pixel.

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            How would iOS be better? There is no blob-free, secure version on their devices at all. Right?

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s not for privacy. But without access to custom ROMs, Android is shit.

                • boonhet@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Sure, but my point was if you can’t even use ROMs because then you lose access to your bank (and now McD apparently), there’s much less reason to use Android - certainly was so 2.5 years ago when they were mostly all promising 2-3 years of support for flagship devices and Apple had a track record of 6-7 years.

                  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Nah, you dont need MacDonalds and you dont need shitty banks that require apps.

                    Apple has a terrible security record lol