return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agoCEO of UnitedHealthcare fatally shot outside of NYC hotel, source sayslockwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square419fedilinkarrow-up1872arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1864arrow-down1external-linkCEO of UnitedHealthcare fatally shot outside of NYC hotel, source sayslockwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agomessage-square419fedilinkfile-text
Remember this? UnitedHealth uses AI model with 90% error rate to deny care, lawsuit alleges https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/11/ai-with-90-error-rate-forces-elderly-out-of-rehab-nursing-homes-suit-claims/
minus-squareCarrolade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down101·3 months agoThe CEO is an employee, a manager. You know how shops have managers hired by the owners to run the place? If that were the motive, wouldn’t owners be the preferred target?
minus-squareByteOnBikes@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up82·edit-23 months agoDid you just say with a straight face that a CEO is simply a middleman who was powerless to change the internal workings of a system?
minus-squarepsycho_driver@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down1·3 months agoHe’s right to suggest that a board of directors should possibly be looked at as equally to blame for a company’s policies and actions.
minus-squareKalothar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down2·3 months agoThey should be, but they are harder to get to. I mean sure you want to kill the opposing militaries generals, but a captain or above is nothing to scoff at. Besides CEOs are more like a lieutenant or full bird Colonel.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·3 months agoCitizens united fucked America in the asshole.
minus-squarebamboo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up32·3 months agoCEOs often are paid primarily in stock, so more than likely this guy had a significant ownership stake.
minus-squareRageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·3 months agoExcuse me? There is a bit left there on your chin.
minus-square5too@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 months agoIf the CEO disagrees with the directions of the board, the CEO has a number of options. They can easily be considered culpable.
minus-squareintresteph@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoSometimes you take what you can get.
The CEO is an employee, a manager. You know how shops have managers hired by the owners to run the place? If that were the motive, wouldn’t owners be the preferred target?
Did you just say with a straight face that a CEO is simply a middleman who was powerless to change the internal workings of a system?
He’s right to suggest that a board of directors should possibly be looked at as equally to blame for a company’s policies and actions.
They should be, but they are harder to get to.
I mean sure you want to kill the opposing militaries generals, but a captain or above is nothing to scoff at.
Besides CEOs are more like a lieutenant or full bird Colonel.
Citizens united fucked America in the asshole.
CEOs often are paid primarily in stock, so more than likely this guy had a significant ownership stake.
Excuse me? There is a bit left there on your chin.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1c1c/d1c1c3d9e242f1013ec9373ebbfcb9526de65733" alt=""
If the CEO disagrees with the directions of the board, the CEO has a number of options. They can easily be considered culpable.
Sometimes you take what you can get.