The United States Supreme Court revealed what some justices touted as a landmark new ethics code last year.

But critics noted that the scandal-plagued institution’s new rules lacked any enforcement mechanisms, making them essentially a 14-page long list of suggestions.

A new leak of secret discussions from behind the bench, published in The New York Times Tuesday, reveals which justices fought to keep the code of conduct toothless.

The Times reported that the court’s nine justices started passing ultra-confidential memos, kept in paper envelopes and off email servers, back and forth at the end of last summer.

    • dneaves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      For the most part I’d say so. Then there’s the portion that fall into “extreme malicious compliance”

      • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        For “extreme malicious compliance,” I’d say there’s also Lawful Chaotic: following the letter of the law to cause chaos.

        Which implies the existence of Chaotic Lawful: upholding the spirit of the law with little to no regard for the letter of the law.