• oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This most certainly is not “World News”. This is a self-promoting opinion piece bordering on conspiracy theory.

    To me, this attack has the master’s prints all over it — the USA had to be involved.

    Edit: I really don’t understand how this article is still up. This is written as a theory of how explosive material could have been inserted into pagers. I find the piece compelling and of interest but it is not news - it’s speculation. Is it now okay to post recipes from around the world in worldnews?

    • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Isn’t it world news that “Israel” attacked Lebanon twice with compromised pagers, or do articles have to come from state-approved sources to be considered news?

      This is a self-promoting opinion piece boring on conspiracy theory.

      What makes you say “conspiracy theory” exactly?

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re not a journalist and speculation is not news. You’re a basement dweller with no first hand account of anything.

        There are appropriate places for your work. This is not the place.

        • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You didn’t answer any of my questions and your hostility is more funny than anything. Do you also get this kneejerk reaction when the NYT or the Guardian publish an opinion piece calling to bomb Iran? Because these count as news, they’re published in real newspapers after all!

          • oxjox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            News outlets very specifically include sections such as Opinion. They do not include speculative conspiracy theories on the front page (or anywhere) labeled as News.

            • CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              What’s the difference between an opinion section and what you deem “speculative conspiracy theories”?

              As a matter of fact what’s the difference between their front page news and the NYT directly quoting Bush making the case to go to war with Iraq? Weren’t they also passing off speculative (Saddam was responsible for 9/11) conspiracy theories (Iraq had WMDs) as News?

              Or is the problem that they are more famous than me thus their opinion is worth more than mine?

              • oxjox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                What’s the difference between an opinion section and what you deem “speculative conspiracy theories”?

                That’s wholly irrelevant. If you want to be an investigative reporter and get real facts to report, have at it and post it as news. You have not done this. You are making guesses. Guesses, by someone with no qualifications or influence, are not news.

                Anything spoken / written by a political leader is news. If you were someone who influenced millions of people, your opinion would be news.

                If I sat down and wrote out a blog about how I believe the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated, would that be News? I mean, I guess you would argue that it is but I am telling you, by definition, it most certainly is not.

                I don’t know what makes you believe your armchair speculation is NEWS. The disconnect is so vast that my brain is breaking. I don’t understand how people on this earth have chosen to ignore the definition of words to suit their own narrative and feelings.