The taped banana - now perhaps one of the most expensive fruits ever sold - was actually bought earlier in the day for a mere $0.35, according to the New York Times.

  • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    It’s really just one of a limited number of licenses which allows the owner of the license to showcase the work and legally regard it as an official work from the artist who first came up with the idea. Anyone can tape a banana to a wall, but only a few can do so and say that it’s an ‘original’.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I don’t know if I can trust the license. Any way to make it burn a ton of electricity to function?

    • Mojave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago
      • who gives a shit if it’s original or derivative
      • Tape a different fruit and it’s now a new original
      • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        I agree, it’s very absurd, and that’s part of the point. It’s also obvious too that someone gives a shit since they’re willing to shell out millions of dollars for it. And as far as taping another piece of fruit to the wall, it unlikely to do well because with modern and conceptual art, it’s all about who came up with the idea first.