Summary
CBS’s 60 Minutes faced intense backlash from Trump allies after host Scott Pelley criticized Donald Trump’s cabinet picks, calling them unqualified and lacking experience.
Pelley highlighted Pete Hegseth (Defense Secretary), Matt Gaetz (Attorney General), Tulsi Gabbard (Director of National Intelligence), and RFK Jr. (head of the CDC) as controversial nominees, citing loyalty to Trump rather than qualifications.
The segment drew sharp criticism from Trumpworld figures like Steven Cheung, Elon Musk, and Charlie Kirk, who labeled it biased propaganda.
Some Democrats and Republicans have also questioned the viability of these nominations in Senate confirmations.
“News finally tells truth for once, gets backlash from people who believe in chem trails.”
Good lord, the right is filled with such spineless baby snowflakes.
Don’t know or care who Steven Cheung is, but Elon Musk and Charlie Kirk are both white nationalist fascists, so if the segment upset them, then kudos to Scott Pelley.
When Trump held a campaign event at Arlington Cemetery, and a soldier tried to stop cameras etc from going in, Steven Cheung is the one who shoved her aside, and later said that she was obviously suffering from some sort of mental episode.
Do Republicans have any facts to dispute in the reporting?
Or are they mad someone pierced the bubble they live in?
If it can be destroyed by the truth, it deserves to be.
Poor poor MAGA cult you are going to have to put up with ridicule a little longer.
Okay, how is this any different from what Fox News, OAN and NewsMax do?
These are objective facts as opposed to random ravings of lunatics. Remember that Fox News’ own lawyers claim that it’s not actually news but rather is entertainment only.
Right, well I forgot they claimed such.
