MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square219fedilinkarrow-up1890arrow-down1109
arrow-up1781arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square219fedilink
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down4·10 months agoTBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.
minus-squarejaschen@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·10 months agoWhile 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoYes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.
minus-squarejaschen@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoSome experts would argue it’s already starting to be uninhabitable.
minus-squareOsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoI think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoYes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.
TBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.
While 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.
Yes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.
Some experts would argue it’s already starting to be uninhabitable.
I think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
Yes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.