• Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Right before the election, of course.

    EDIT: Israel has announced its over and Iran says the attacks were limited. I’m actually surprised, hopefully it means that the escalations between the two are over.

    Taken from the live page at Al Jazeera:

    Iran’s military has confirmed that Israeli strikes on the country targeted military bases in Ilam, Khuzestan and Tehran provinces, causing “limited damage.”

    The statement from Iran’s armed forces was read aloud on state television, which showed no images from the sites of the attacks.

    Iran’s military claimed its air defences limited the damage inflicted by Israel’s strikes.

    Link to page: https://aje.io/zs30s7

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      What Iranian hospitals or schools did Israel hit?

      Based on intelligence, IAF aircraft struck missile manufacturing facilities used to produce the missiles that Iran fired at the State of Israel over the last year. These missiles posed a direct and immediate threat to the citizens of the State of Israel. Simultaneously, the IDF struck surface-to-air missile arrays and additional Iranian aerial capabilities, that were intended to restrict Israel’s aerial freedom of operation in Iran. Source

      • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They missed. Missiles intercepted. The schools and hospitals are safe. For now. (.TM/knock on wood)

  • ButtermilkBiscuit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Israel says” - Oh so lies then. Gotcha.

    Still waiting for the proof of those underground hamas command bunkers filled with gold and beheaded Jewish babies to appear.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whenever they claim that about Gaza the target is usually a hospital. So ya’know, “trustworthy.”

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Iran would be putting those civilian casualties on blast if they existed. They don’t, which is why Iran is complaining about Iranian soldiers and destroyed Iranian military targets.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they’re actually telling the truth about ‘precise military targets,’ and I’m not confident of that, this is not as bad as I had feared.

    Not good, but not as bad as I had feared, which was a much more massive retaliation.

    Now we just have to hope things don’t keep escalating.

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Iran made it clear that if the attack was contained, than they would let it be. If not, then they retaliate.

      If they do intend to retaliate, I don’t expect it happening before the election. They know these kinds of things help Trump and the last thing they want is a Trump presidency.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        My problem is that I don’t trust Israel’s claim that this was precise and I also don’t trust Iran’s claim that if it is contained, they won’t retaliate.

        Because I don’t trust either government at all.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sorry to say that but escalation is the only way to stop Israel and it’s genocidal campain

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Stopping a genocide by potentially killing far more people than the genocide is killing doesn’t seem like a very good alternative.

        • small44@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          When in history a colonized power was stopped without ton of civilians dying because of the colonizer refusal for peace? Are you telling me that for example that India shouldn’t have resisted the British empire because 100 millions Indian died? I wish there was a world where peace happen without sacrificing a single person, but that’s not the reality.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            When did I say there shouldn’t be resistance?

            Resistance to genocide and an escalating war between two nuclear powers are very different things.

            If you think Iran actually gives a shit about Palestinians and what Israel is doing to them, you’re wrong.

            • small44@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              The Usa and other allies won’t stop supporting Israel politically and military, Palestine can’t beat Israel alone, it need support from other countries . I don’t hear people calling for not escalating against Russia and rightfully so. Both Israel and Russia are occupiers.

              Yes Iran doesn’t really care about Palestinians but their interests align with supporting armed groups against Israel

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                You don’t seem to get it. There won’t be a Palestine if this war keeps escalating. Because Iran will annihilate it along with Israel.

                Believe it or not, Palestine doesn’t have a giant radiation shield.

                Also, the idea that millions of dead Israelis and Iranians even if nukes aren’t used is worth it because of Palestine is extremely ethically messed up.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago
    BBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for BBC:

    Wiki: reliable - BBC is a British publicly funded broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. This includes BBC News, BBC documentaries, and the BBC History site (on BBC Online). However, this excludes BBC projects that incorporate user-generated content (such as h2g2 and the BBC Domesday Project) and BBC publications with reduced editorial oversight (such as Collective). Statements of opinion should conform to the corresponding guideline.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn4v67j88e0t

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support