(Yes, of course I know that’s not the Enterprise-D and that TNG came out in 1986, but you try making a better debunking joke.)

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    But that’s a low-budget show. The Apollo Program had billions to invest in VFX.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been to the NASA space center and they’ve got a very vivid recreation of the moon landing in a museum. I have no doubt you could have faked the video. But how they got a moon lander and a flag up there remains a mystery.

      Also, we landed on the moon six different times. Even if you’re skeptical of Neil and Buzz, it kept happening through Cernan. By Apollo 17, it was barely newsworthy.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And the old saying “three people can keep a secret, if 2 are dead” comes to mind. The number of people who would know, just in astronauts, tells me someone would’ve squealed.

        There was a movie in the 1980’s that used this premise, but the astronauts weren’t supposed to know (I think), or were only told pretty late. Capricorn One (with OJ Simpson if memory serves). Not a great movie, hell, not even good, just an interesting concept.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The number of people who would know, just in astronauts, tells me someone would’ve squealed.

          There are definitely conspiracies that have happened in the US that have stayed (officially) sealed for decades at a time. There’s also no shortage of (unofficial) leaks and Deep-Throat style informants willing to sell you a story about the moon landing being a hoax.

          I wouldn’t say the problem is that nobody squealed. I’d say the problem is that folks who claim they were in the room when Kubrick shot the B-roll for the moon landing from a Hollywood sound stage are not sources that stand up to prolonged interrogation.

          Capricorn One (with OJ Simpson if memory serves).

          I’ve heard of it. Mars instead of the Moon. An interesting premise.

          I’m also partial to For All Mankind as a “What If” of the US and Soviets continuing the space race for another forty years. Both explore interesting concepts about the intersection of politics and space exploration.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            For sure.

            Stuff can be kept secret, it’s just difficult, and is usually accomplished via all sorts of obfuscation.

            Like doing something layered deep within something else, making it appear to be a day-to-event (hiding materiel in containers labeled as something else, making it weigh and move normally, then having military deliver it as usual, because who would think these drums of fuel are actually heavy water, or something like that).

            The moon landings were live. Quite a bit harder, I’d think.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The moon landings were live.

              That is, again, a thing skeptics will dispute for this or that reason.

              But that’s the thing with conspiracy theorists and skeptics. Ask a flat earther how you get live images from space and they’ll just tell you “We don’t, its fake”.