• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a bad article. Its misrepresenting the paper its based on.

    The study this article is based on was represented here on Lemmy 4 days ago with a much better (but still not great) article. That Lemmy conversation is : HERE

    I’ll post here the important piece I posted there:

    The study author’s argument isn’t against methane or even fracking per se. Its against the extra pollution from EXPORTING methane by ships.

    I would paraphrase the study author’s position more clearly as: “A ship full of coal produces less pollution than a ship full of liquid methane because of all the leakage and energy needed to make that ship full of methane then back to burnable natural gas”

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, at the time Fukushima happened the reactor was already decades out of date - we had technology at the time that would have prevented any disaster (i.e. molten salt reactors using thorium that self destruct safely if a chain reaction occurs).