I’ll start:

  • Some significant portion of funds go towards development of the Lemmy software. 80%? Rest goes to lemmy instance hosting.
  • Ads are reasonable and non-intrusive (no popups etc)
  • People can still browse w/ an adblocker

I personally would gladly turn off my adblocker if I knew the ads were supporting development. Hell, I might even click a few!

  • nuez_jr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Straightforward funding requests from the instance are just fine. Advertisements can gargle a cactus.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my view, the problem isn’t monetizing an instance, but that ads right now are fundamentally problematic. I don’t know of a way to introduce ads that wouldn’t be intrusive, invade user privacy, introduce bad motives for admins, and just be generally unpleasant. If money is a problem, I think a subscriber model would be better suited for the platform rather than taking any step to normalize ads.

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Any lemmy instance using ads instead of donations should be abandoned to wither and die. It should get globally defederated… because any users ok with ads are not users we want on the fediverse.

  • esc27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Transparency - where the ads come from, how the revenue is used, etc.
    • the ads are safe and appropriate and follow the same rules as posts and comments
    • the ads are clearly labeled or otherwise visually distinct and not disguised as user generated content
    • the ads do not make up more than 10% of the displayed content (by any metric (screen space, text, bytes, etc.)
    • the ads are in like/kind to the surrounding content (e.g. if the community is text only, so are the ads, if the community allows images but not video, then the ads cannot move, etc.)
    • no tracking
    • the ads can be removed via subscription or donation
    • no double dipping (e.g. charging for access and still showing ads.) Members who support the instance should not see ads, members who see ads should not be required to pay.
    • a transparent removal process for problematic ads
  • ShadowCatEXE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Opt-in ads. Disabled by default, but gives the user the choice to support the instance if they do not want to (or can’t) provide a monetary donation.

    I don’t want ads any other way.

  • redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather do monthly payments than having ads. Oh wait, I’m already contributing monthly.

  • FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i wouldn’t mind sacrificing the first post on my home feed as a dedicated advertising spot (clearly marked), if it helps keep things running.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without tracking/privacy invasion, related to the board/community, non animated, not excessive

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If a website needs ads to thrive, it needs ads to thrive. I don’t look forward to playing the role of both the beggar and the chooser. As I explain here, under the exact circumstances of today, I’m not afraid to say I’m judgy when someone mentions adblock usage.