I can’t believe that I have to post this, but AI kiddie stuff is still kiddie stuff. It may or may not be illegal where you live, but it is not OK to post on this instance and we will ban you with extreme prejudice. Thank you.

  • alynnetjes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hard agree. Though I do have a question I imagine these are people with desires(wrong or bad), but a human drive none the less. Acting on that is wrong I fully agree. However if we keep calling them crepes and idiots and other names like this. People who have these desires and realize they are problematic, where can they go? We are literally pushing them away without giving them an option to redeem.

    The reason i put this here is because creating this stigma will make more people more desperate, making in turn more kiddie stuff.

    For anyone reading this, go to a counselor, a trusted gp, a psychiatrist who doesn’t judge. Do not act on these desires, but find help to talk about them.

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. Fundamentally, being attracted to children isn’t any different from a foot fetish. They can’t change how their brain is wired, and they’re not monsters for feeling that way. They should absolutely be able to seek help without concern.

      And, while I believe the AI gen stuff is disgusting, if it prevents a real child from being abused… Idk, it’s a super nuanced issue.

      Now, that all changes if they start trying to act on those feelings.

  • AvaddonLFC ☄️ 🤘@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I appreciate the swift response. Looks like all of the user’s content was removed as well. Was it multiple posts or only one? I only noticed one such post and purged it on our end.

    • Mikey Mongol @lemmynsfw.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we’re talking about the same person, there was one multi-image post that was unquestionably over the line and one or two more that were (IMO) borderline. Given the context provided by the one post we chose not to give the benefit of any doubt.

      • AvaddonLFC ☄️ 🤘@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, that’s the one, I reported that to one of your admins this morning. Good to know, I’ll do the same and get rid of their content history as well.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Them: “But it’s not even real”

    Us: “The intent is though, you fucking creep.”

    Them: “There’s nothing illegal about it.”

    Us: “HOW ARE YOU NOT GETTING THE FUCKING POINT HERE?”

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ngl when I started reading this I didn’t look at the community, and thought this was going into tax benefits for some reason.

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Took me a minute to figure out that you weren’t talking about denying content to immature AI models, lol. I may need some food.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone who generates or consumes this type of content should just do the world a favor and die. I’m not joking. And I will not be taking questions or “what-about-isms”.