Just a moment...
www.patreon.com
  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    141·
    3 months ago

    Getting very close?

    At this point they should just have that announcement when they actually have the thing.

    • Leaflet@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      13·
      3 months ago

      There’s non-destructive editing in 2.99. Not everything is non-destructive though, such as rotating and scaling. But most colors and filters are.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      8·
      3 months ago

      Naïve me it college hearing non-destructive editing was right around the corner. The corner was well over a decade. 😅

    • Leaflet@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      7·
      3 months ago

      Fedora 41 is shipping the 2.99 version. And naturally will update to RC1 and later once they release.

  • anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.mlEnglish
    211·
    3 months ago

    God idk what version I’m even using. I never update programs like this unless I have to. From breaking things, to confusing my workflow and moving things around; I’ve always been more frustrated than thankful. I haven’t updated Reaper in ages too and I’m certain they’re better about keeping continuity than anyone.

    Edit: lol people are mad about my own software updating habits? why and how are .worlders this way? I can’t imagine the realities they live in, and am glad so

    • Julian@lemm.eeEnglish
      9·
      3 months ago

      You posted something that’s bad practice (for many reasons, including security). Like, nobody cared about your software habits until you posted them publically with no prompting. probably so you could act smug after getting downvoted.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      8·
      3 months ago

      On the other hand, why did you feel the need to share this? Generally you are decreasing your security by this practice, and it’s not a good idea for others to adopt it. And no, you don’t need to understand security models and specific exploits for them to harm you

    • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
      41·
      3 months ago

      Idk. I agree that it’s a bad practice, but I also don’t understand the downvotes. I think in this context it’s valid to share your preference whether to update or not. Maybe some people just click dislike because it has lots of dislikes? Who knows :)