• wanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s something you should ask Greenland, something one might do in some sort of negotiation.

      • wanderer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You seem to want to know the answer to the question and I have already given you all I can. so I will just repeat:

        I certainly would not be involved so I don’t know why you think I should be the one that comes up with any plan. I don’t have to be a subject matter expert to advocate for a cause. I don’t have to be an OB-GYN to advocate for abortion rights. I don’t have to be an environmental scientist to advocate for action on climate change. And I don’t have to be an expert on polar bears to be able to say “Maybe we shouldn’t kill polar bears.”

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          And I don’t have to be an expert on polar bears to be able to say “Maybe we shouldn’t kill polar bears.”

          Except you have not given a viable alternative to killing the polar bear.

          • wanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I have given an alternative. It is just not perfectly detailed enough for some random person on the internet that has no say in anything related to the subject.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You have not given a viable alternative. Your alternative is “negotiate with Greenland.” That is not viable and I explained why. It risks their entire polar bear population. It would have the potential to kill far more than just one polar bear and much more slowly and painfully.

              But I guess that’s your preferred solution to shooting a single bear in Iceland, the first since 2016.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The Icelandic government, what with it being in their purview. And they decided the best course of action was to kill the bear.

                  You saying “maybe they shouldn’t have killed it” is not a solution to the issue.

                  Don’t forget to downvote this post. It’s vital that you downvote all of my posts for some reason.

                  • wanderer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    For the easy solution, all you have to do is ask the people with the gun. Congratulations the easy solution won.