Unity announces its revamped pricing model | After outcry from the gaming community, Unity revealed a new plan that’s a drastic departure from what was initially announced.::Unity has introduced a revamped version of its new pricing model. The updated pricing scheme arrives a little more than a week after the disastrous original announcement that infuriated developers.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol it’s not a “drastic departure”. All they did was to remove some of the passages that were dubiously legal, effectively unenforceable, or both. They also didn’t address the sketchy anticompetitive (and probably illegal) fee vouchers that were clearly an attempt to sink AppLovin, nor did they say anything about the sneaky license change they made a while ago to enable this whole snafu. The exec team, who are the ones who pushed this whole clusterfuck, are not going anywhere, and will probably try something stupid like this in the future.

    Unity’s fucked. They’ve established that they’re unconcerned with business ethics, and are clearly willing to operate in bad faith towards business partners. They have destroyed any real trust the industry had in them. You can’t buy that back.

  • Xilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the damage may already be done to Unity. Devs have been moving to alternatives like Unreal and I doubt this walk back would make them change their minds.

    • Someguy89@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nor should they change their minds. How do developers know they won’t try this BS again? Trust has been eroded all for the sake of a quick profit. If I was a developer I wouldn’t touch their products again.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This could even have cascading effects with others using similar business models. Relying on a product that a for profit company provides for free is risky, especially if the company is publically traded.

        Though the real point I’m seeing in all of this is that there needs to be more regulation about “terms of service” and “end user agreements”, rather than just letting companies say whatever and then letting the courts determine what flies when push comes to shove.

  • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And there we have it, the inevitable outcome. Ask for something insane -> apologize and backtrack -> ask for something slightly more reasonable (which was the original desire all along they just thought they wouldn’t get away with it in a vacuum). It’s classic bs and i hope people don’t buy it. Fuck Unity.

    • the_inebriati@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t buy this at all. The door-in-the-face strategy doesn’t really work if it leaves the customer feeling like they’d rather get rid of the door and start over with a new door technology.

      You can squeeze your customers in a way that doesn’t make you look insane and Unity chose to not do that.