- Reptile ? You mean dino - If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles, and therefore birds are reptiles - If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles - ? - Birds are a clade of dinosaurs ( a child group). In exactly the same way, dinosaurs are a clade of reptiles. So by extension, birds are a clade of reptiles. - You and I are also walking fish. - I think they were pointing out the structural issue with your statement. They info you are attempting to convey is correct. Your ability to do so is questionable. - If birds are dinos, then dinos are reptiles - I’m not sure what is structurally wrong with that statement. Birds are dinosaurs (most people know this by now). Using the exact same logic, dinosaurs are reptiles as well. - a= “birds are dinos” - b= “dinos are reptiles” - c= “birds are reptiles” - Structure: If a then b, therefore c - a does not imply b without an additional statement (which we can assume from the rest would be “because birds are reptiles”) - You’ve basically just said birds are reptiles because birds are reptiles - I see. Thank you you for that explanation. I was letting inference do some heavy lifting. (and yes, I’m not a great communicator) 
 
 
 
- But fish don’t exist. 
- There’s no such thing as a fish. - Been binging QI lately? 
 
- We’re worms too! 
 
 
 
 
- And it’s not the original penguin ™️ 
- And here I was looking for Saddam - Saddam was in its belly. I’ve highlighted here: 
  
 
- And here I thought the evolutionary split between feathers and armor plates was what separated modern birds and reptiles. 
- Not alligators? 





