Musk’s repeated outbursts against advertisers have dried up the main source of revenue for the loss-making company formerly known as Twitter. A recent decision to sue them for heeding his own advice to not buy ads on the platform hasn’t helped. At some point, he will have to provide a fresh infusion of cash to salvage his $44 billion takeover.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The problem with Tesla really is Elon.

    If he sells his majority stake, I suspect it would be a lot better.

    The biggest reason against buying them is him. They also make more than cars (their powerwalls seem alright).

    If X fails though, I suspect all those bigots will flood over to here (Facebook and X seem to be distracting them for now).

    Let them have their nazi prison. Just make it not profitable

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Personally I’d be wary of putting a giant brick of lithium in my house, especially from a company with the questionable quality control of Tesla.

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I agree partially, but in practice, the LFP batteries should be fine (I would never trust the PowerWall 2).

        Unfortunately, been looking at other alternatives, and there don’t seem to be many seamless home batteries that cut in instantly in the event of a power outage (like an online UPS) either.

        The reality is though, I expect Tesla to lose this market anyway (they only just introduced the PowerWall 3 in AU… Even cheap chinese manufacturers have been using LFP for a while)

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The people who aren’t buying Teslas because they hate Musk aren’t gonna change their mind because he sold some stock. The company is tainted forever.

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They won’t a tiny amount… But controlling share they might.

        I can’t afford a Tesla. However, my biggest concern is that musk will half arse firmware or sabotage the company somehow.

        If he doesn’t have controlling share, that’s a win and I suspect quality control will likely improve too

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m not so sure. The overlap between “people who would like a high end EV” and “people who won’t buy something associated with Musk” has to be pretty big. I imagine if Musk’s roll was reduced the Board would have to put some work in to rebuild their brand, though - maybe by really focusing hard on quality control and longer-than-standard warranties for a few years, the way Royal Enfield did to shake off their own reputation for shoddy workmanship and cheap parts. Then they could let “the Musk years” fade into history and retake their reputation as the Premuim American EV.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Having worked with Tesla I can tell you not all their problems would leave with Elon, but it would certainly be a great start.