• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    At some point wouldn’t gravity override the expansion and cause a contraction again?

    • DeadNinja@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Last I checked, the “Big Crunch” hypothesis got rejected by scientists.

      I am no expert, so can’t elaborate any further.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s alright, I wasn’t an expert when I asked the question. I was just curious about it.

    • Pottsunami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Heres a great source

      It explains why the universe will have a cold death instead of a heat death.

      Right now the universe is expanding and its expanding faster today than yesterday. Things could change, but current math points to a cold death

      • xanu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        I always interpreted “heat death” as “the death of heat” instead of “a hot death”

        • Pottsunami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You are correct and I misremembered it. “The Big Freeze” and “Heat Death” are the same thing. Thats when everything expands until there is no more heat.

          If someone knows the correct terms for what I am talking about please let me know. Let me explain further.

          What I am talking about is the opposite of heat death, which is somehow in my mind at a hot death? Basically, where everything goes back to one singularity instead of expanding forever.