0110010001100010@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoPeople who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in officewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1external-linkPeople who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in officewww.theguardian.com0110010001100010@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square76fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square_number8_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·1 year agoWFH allowance should be mandated – anyone that wants it for a job where it’s possible must be allowed it. it’s such a dramatic quality of life difference.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agofor literally no cost too. What exactly are companies losing with WFH? Literaly nothing.
minus-squareTheRTV@lemmy.filmlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThe money they spend on the building and maintenance.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAnd how would they not lose that if people were working in the office?
WFH allowance should be mandated – anyone that wants it for a job where it’s possible must be allowed it. it’s such a dramatic quality of life difference.
for literally no cost too. What exactly are companies losing with WFH? Literaly nothing.
The money they spend on the building and maintenance.
And how would they not lose that if people were working in the office?