For me, when I get books I often get the cheaper paperback option, give it a read.

Then if I really liked this book, I’ll donate it to a charity shop or in my social circle and purchase the hardcover version.

The only gripe I have with hardcover though is some books come with that sleeve cover around it, you know the one, bit fidgety to use when reading.

Paperback I like if there’s a book I am mildly interested in and I’ll just go “whatever” I’ll keep it as part a collection.

Paperbacks = cheap as chips but aren’t as protected as hardcover, easy to fill up your collection or shelf with, might sell it if i want the luxurious version of that book. this is for me.

Hardcover = More luxurious as it provides proper protection to the pages and outer area of the book, Often comes with items as part of a collectors set. Usually I get the same book if I really enjoy it to add as a gem of my shelf.

What are your tastes? Same as me or do you lean more heavily to one or the other?

  • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Personally I’d like me some blend between paperback and hardcover.

    Paperbacks can be laid flat (but damage quickly), hardcovers not as easily (but don’t damage quickly).

    Something like a concealed Cased-in-Wire-O might be best, but where you don’t really see the spirals between the pages.