• ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Regarding the actual article, I have nothing to add that hasn’t been discussed already (and at this point I bet nobody will see this comment anyway). However, the specific grammar error in the title annoys me to no end, so I wanted to vent.

    …one in 10 residents are…

    It should be “…one in 10 residents is…”

    People seem to forget how to conjugate after three words. Similarly, all too often I read something like, “None of these things are…” I don’t have an English degree, but in my mind parsing that phrase is like nails on a chalkboard.

    For the 0 of you still reading, a tip: You can omit certain parts of the sentence - and expand others - to test how the subject-verb pair sounds.

    “None of these things are…” -> “Not one of these things are…” -> “Not one are…” Wtf??

    Anyway, thanks for listening to my Ted Talk Ralph Rant.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “1 in 10 residents” does not refer to a person but a proportion of people, which is a plurality of people. Change it to “10% of residents” and it’s clear that 'are"is more gooder.

      If you want to super expand it…

      A proportion of 1 in 10 residents are…

      Or

      Proportionally 1 in 10 residents are…

      Aaand also…

      “are” acts on “residents”, not “1 in 10”. “1 in 10” is an adjective phrase. Residents is the noun.