fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoT. rexmander.xyzimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down15
arrow-up1138arrow-down1imageT. rexmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareDaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year agoNot according to this post https://lemmy.ml/comment/12594857 Edit: here’s a direct link to the article if the link above is broken for some reason https://news.sky.com/story/tyrannosaurus-rex-could-have-been-even-bigger-than-previously-thought-study-suggests-13184470
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoThat’s not a link to the actual paper. The King of the Hill meme above claims that the actual paper says that physical limits apply to maximum size. This implies the article misrepresents the research paper.
Not according to this post https://lemmy.ml/comment/12594857
Edit: here’s a direct link to the article if the link above is broken for some reason
https://news.sky.com/story/tyrannosaurus-rex-could-have-been-even-bigger-than-previously-thought-study-suggests-13184470
That’s not a link to the actual paper. The King of the Hill meme above claims that the actual paper says that physical limits apply to maximum size. This implies the article misrepresents the research paper.
Ah, I get it now. Thanks!