Couldn’t we have a lead box lined with these radiation to electricity converters with a small amount of radioactive material in the center, and have an energy generating device that would last for thousands or even millions of years? Imagine putting the sun in a box lined with solar cells, but on a much smaller scale.

Is there a reason this wouldn’t work?

  • nukeworker10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This article has a good breakdown. The biggest issue is efficiency. RTGs are around 5-9% efficient. Standard steam cycle generators are around 30% (see this article ) . You get much more usable energy from fuel used in a commercial reactor vice a RTG.

      • nukeworker10@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        They take the waste heat from nuclear decay and convert it to electricity through the use of a peltier device. Those work off of differential temperature and are pretty inefficient to begin with. Unmderated Nuclear decay doesn’t produce a lot of heat at one time, which is why reactors use a moderator to increase the power output.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      From the article it looks like RTGs are just converting the heat energy into electricity. Seems like there’s a lot unused potential being missed.