• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    One important thing to note (according to the issuing letter I saw) was that this was a 10$ credit no strings attached. That actually makes me pretty happy to see it and I applaud them for it. Usually companies will try and attach a paltry sum like this to some thinly veiled settlement agreement to trick customers into surrendering their right to sue… in this case it was actually a gift - it may be a tiny gift, but it’s still a gesture of good faith before the lawyers get involved.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Probably a split bargain deal with Uber Eats as it is not a useful amount for an actual order and the extra customers trying to use it will result in a net gain. I bet they are only paying a relatively small fixed amount because of the net benefit to UE, if they are paying anything at all. I can easily picture UE doing a $10 campaign on their own targeting the general public for the same promotional potential.

    • comador @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was only for select VARS in their gold tier and higher, not to mention they stopped doing it yesterday after backlash.