Amazon.com’s Whole Foods Market doesn’t want to be forced to let workers wear “Black Lives Matter” masks and is pointing to the recent US Supreme Court ruling permitting a business owner to refuse services to same-sex couples to get federal regulators to back off.

National Labor Relations Board prosecutors have accused the grocer of stifling worker rights by banning staff from wearing BLM masks or pins on the job. The company countered in a filing that its own rights are being violated if it’s forced to allow BLM slogans to be worn with Whole Foods uniforms.

Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings, saying the case “provides a clear roadmap” to throw out the NLRB’s complaint.

The dispute is one of several in which labor board officials are considering what counts as legally-protected, work-related communication and activism on the job.

  • BigNote@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    On its own it’s not, but it definitely is in the current political and cultural context. There’s no getting away from that. It’s going to provoke a political reaction in any conservative and there’s no point in pretending otherwise.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s an indictment of Conservatism. What are they trying to Conserve and when was America great? Cause it was not great for folks of color or queer folk back then, and we wont go back.

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can and do agree with everything you argue while also maintaining the objectively obvious fact that context matters in politics.