Mayor London Breed said a “very aggressive” sweep of San Francisco homeless encampments will start in August, after a recent Supreme Court ruling cleared the path for widespread enforcement.

In June, the Supreme Court ruled that enforcing rules against homeless people for sleeping outside doesn’t violate the Eighth Amendment’s “cruel and unusual punishment” clause.

On Thursday, Breed celebrated the ruling and said the city plans to change its protocols and may begin issuing criminal penalties against homeless people.

“Thank goodness for the change in the Supreme Court decision,” Breed said at an election debate hosted by a local firefighter’s union. “Effective August, we are going to be very aggressive and assertive in moving encampments, which may even include criminal penalties.”

  • finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Or how about you actually build some housing for these people?

    edit: i guess i should have said affordable housing…

    • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We already built more than enough houses. The problem is that bank and landlords profits contribute to economic growth, the mandate of capitalism. Housing the homeless would contribute far more to economic growth. But, it’d take more than four years to see the results.

      So no. We can’t house them. The need to suffer because otherwise capitalism is threatened.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The chronically homeless, the ones that are hardest to get off the street, are difficult to house for reasons besides availability or cost, though.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And we could still fund a facility and staff to house and treat them and it would be cheaper than the current emergency services and courts costs. It would also be more humane and prevent massive encampments from forming.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s not as much profit in it, so the private sector won’t touch it, it’s that simple.

      We need social housing, designed and built to be as affordable as possible, with the option to rent at just above cost or rent to buy.

      Of course, the usual twats will start crying about socialism but fuck them. If capitalism fails then the state has to step in.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      We need affordable housing AND mandated drug / phsyc treatment programs for some of these people. One without the other won’t help enough.

    • Deello@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Housing costs money so evicting them is actually saving money. /S