• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    8 months ago

    He’s being misquoted by the headline. He FEARS that it will make the same mistakes. Let’s be clear about RISC is here in the first place: an open-source hardware architecture. Anyone with enough money and willpower to fork it for their needs will do so. It’s anyone’s game still. He’s just simply saying that the same type of people who took over ARM and x86 are doomed to make the same mistakes. Not that RISC-V is bad.

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m being pedantic here but RISC-V is not a hardware architecture as in something that you can send to a manufacturer and get it made. It is an ISA. How you implement those ISA is up to you. Yes there are open implementations but I think it is important to distinguish it.

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          So does x86. The difference is license. Just like how Intel and AMD have a VERY different design (implementation) as of now, so does RISC-V. Any vendor can implement it however they want, but they won’t have to pay anyone for using RISC-V ISA

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    smells like linus thinks there is going to be an ever increasing tech debt, and honestly, i think i agree with him on that one.

    RISCV is likely going to eventually overstep it’s role in someplaces, and bits and pieces of it will become archaic over time.

    The gap between hardware and software level abstraction is huge, and that’s really hard to fill properly. You just need a strict design criteria to get around that one.

    I’m personally excited to see where RISCV goes, but maybe what we truly need is a universal software level architecture that can be used on various different CPU architectures providing maximum flexibility.

  • lps@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well regardless, the world needs alternatives that are outside of restrictive US patent law and large monopolistic control. Thank god for pioneers:)

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      ARM Inc is an English company owned by a Japanese company

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    RISC-V is the only shot we have at usable open source hardware. I really, really hope it takes off.

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s open source nature protects against that. People mistake Linus as being in the same boat as Stallman but Linus was only open source by circumstance, he kind infamously doesn’t seem to appreciate the role open source played in his own success.

    It already directly addresses the mistakes of x86 and ARM. I don’t know what he is so worried about.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Protects against what?

      What I read here is just a vague critic from him of the relation between hard- and software developer. Which will not change just because the ISA is open source. It will take some iterations until this is figured out, this is inevevable.

      Soft- and hardware developers are experts in their individual fields, there are not many with enough know-how of both fields to be effective.

      Linus also points out, that because of ARM before, RISC-V might have a easier time, on the software side, but mistakes will still happen.

      IMO, this article doesn’t go into enough depths of the RISC-V specific issues, that it warrants RISC-V in the title, it would apply to any up and coming new ISA.

    • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      He doesn’t list what the mistakes will be. He said that he fears that because hardware people aren’t software people, that they will make the same mistakes that x86 made, which were then made by Arm later.

      He did mention that fixing those mistakes was faster for Arm than x86, so that brings hope that fixing the mistakes on Risc V will take less time

  • magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe, but the point is that it’s open. There’s a much higher chance that one of the companies that builds parts will make good decisions.