This is the best summary I could come up with:
No
Well, “non” I suppose.
…too much oui oui in the water.
Can you elaborate?
No
That clears it up, thank you.
Scarfolk council’s Olympics advice:
Good bot
Is any city ready for the Olympics? Doesn’t this happen every four years?
Is any city ready for the aftermath of the Olympics? What are the plans for this stadium after the fact
I mean Paris is a massive city with major sports teams and regular events outside the Olympics.
And yet cities end up losing money when hosting the Olympics most of the time.
In general, the revenue brought in from the games does not equate to the money put out by the host city. London generated $5.2 billion in revenue against its $14.6 billion spent, said Investopedia. In 2010, Vancouver spent $7.6 billion on the Olympics but brought in only $2.8 billion. In 2008, Beijing’s $42 billion investment generated revenue of just $3.6 billion. In fact, every Olympics since 1960 has been over budget, and an analysis from the University of Oxford found the games overrun their costs by an average of 172%. Los Angeles in 1984 remains the “only host city that realized a profit from the games,” Investopedia said, but this is largely “because the infrastructure required of them already existed.”
https://theweek.com/sports/olympics-cost-hosting
They get conned into bidding for it every two years anyway though.
Most of the new facilities are constructed with wood and recycled aluminum, and the plans at the end are to dismantle them and reuse the components in other building projects. Its actually kind of a neat idea, but we’ll see how it actually gets implemented.
Most of the stuff was already built before the Olympics. There are very few new constructions.
The Olympics is a cancer on cities and no sane taxpayer should ever agree to hosting this.
Also wtf are “convoluted” QR codes. A QR code is a QR code, or is that too much to grasp
It would be pretty funny if this is how the newest bird flu pandemic starts
