return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoDonald Trump's chances of winning New Jersey are growingwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down123
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkDonald Trump's chances of winning New Jersey are growingwww.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squarereturn2ozma@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down32·1 year agoA Republican hasn’t won New Jersey in 40 years. Biden needs to go. Put somebody better in.
minus-squaredhork@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·edit-21 year agoNew Jersey can embrace politicians who are corrupt assholes, but cannot abide ones who have a set bedtime.
minus-squarenondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoSeems like that’s the case. So do we ignore it because it’s hypocritical?
minus-squareuienia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWhat else is there to do? There is no appeasement of hypocrites.
minus-squarenondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoLosing NJ because you dont want to appease hypocrites is pretty silly.
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down5·1 year agoWe can vote someone better in 4 years, but he’s so so much better than trump.
A Republican hasn’t won New Jersey in 40 years. Biden needs to go. Put somebody better in.
New Jersey can embrace politicians who are corrupt assholes, but cannot abide ones who have a set bedtime.
Seems like that’s the case. So do we ignore it because it’s hypocritical?
What else is there to do? There is no appeasement of hypocrites.
Losing NJ because you dont want to appease hypocrites is pretty silly.
We can vote someone better in 4 years, but he’s so so much better than trump.