• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why don’t YOU go ahead and write me up a 2-page essay on why Trump isn’t planning a dictatorship, cite your sources. That’s essentially what you’re asking me to do and it’s guaranteed you’ll give a short, flippant remark that doesn’t actually address any of the issues brought up, basically wasting my time. It’ll be a bunch of whataboutism, gaslighting, misdirection, and BS, that’s the standard MO.

          • Grunt4019@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            So you’re saying your preferred choice of the two wants to become a dictator but you’re fine with it because you think the constitution will stop him?

            If that’s not the case why even cite the constitution.

            • StaySquared@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yep. There’s absolutely no way home boy on his last Presidential day is going to claim to have the powers to continue his Presidency indefinitely.

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          Election fraud means the election would be voided and it would have to go to contingent election? I forget the process. I have no idea wtf Trump is talking about.

          I’m not a, “MAGA” soldier. Quite frankly he’s just the better option of the two.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Constitution only matters if it is being enforced. And 2017-2020 showed us that very few Republicans were willing to do that.

        Currently SCOTUS is debating whether president has absolute immunity (in other words, if he can commit any crime, including murdering his political opponents) something that is absolutely against our constitution, yet they have to debate it.