Pay the lady whatever she asks and make it sound COMPLETELY like her. Worth it.
They asked her already and she refused.
There’s no such a thing as “too much Scarlett Johansson”
Depends on whether or not she has grounds to sue.
If she can prove they used Johansen’s voice as training data… Maybe. If the pitch and tambre of openai’s voice came about naturally I don’t see what leg they have to stand on.
Iirc it’s not like recording artists can sue other singers that happen to sound like them.
Cool, please sit through 1,000 hours of Black Widow.
Black Widow is a good film tho?
Red Sparrow is the better Black Widow movie.
Perhaps. But just because duck à l’orange is the superior dinner entree doesn’t mean I can’t still be perfectly satisfied with a nice grilled ribeye steak.
Most unhinged comment on the internet.
Sir there are literal Nazis online.
I know what I said
ChatGPT has a voice?
It does. And it’s horny.
How is it horny?
I need details.
Since everyone is forcing OpenAI to license their data, OpenAI is being forced to scrape free chaturbate streams.
So all it does is ask for tips?
While sitting there doing absolutely nothing then occasionally typing and looking bored… Or so my friend tells me.
Here is a sample
That’s actually pretty good!
That’s actually scarily good.
They revealed some sort of companion for your phone that is ironically close to those in the movie „Her“ where the virtual girlfriend is voiced by Scarlet Johansson.
They want us to believe it was by accident but I’m pretty sure it wasn’t.
It’s definitely not an accident. This is Cuntman’s goal.
Yeah if you have the app click on the headphones button. Not sure if it is available on free version.
It’s fairly useful. I was cleaning yesterday and just going over some study material with it. Didn’t have to keep stopping to type.
The ChatGPT case aside, what are the copyright laws on impersonating the voice of an actor portraying a particular film character? If someone imitates the voice of Johnny Depp playing Jack Sparrow, or Andy Serkis playing Gollum, but makes no reference to the character apart from the voice performance, does that infringe on the copyright to the character?
Apparently the answer is no. There is even someone making a KITT app using a LLM, but using an AI voice based on a voice imitator as they didn’t got the rights from William Daniels and that’s legal.
Let’s just make the worse possible and then wait to see what happens. Only way to wake up from the AI nightmare. If we survive long enough.
IANAL but probably not
Sky is my favorite voice. It’d be a shame if they took it away as her voice is by far the best one of the bunch. It sounds so natural and makes Siri, Cortana, and Alexa seem crude in comparison.
Kinda related. What do you call yours? I called my GPT.
Haven’t really assigned a name yet. I only just subscribed to it a few days ago to help me create cover letters to accompany my resume.
concerns it sounds too much like Scarlett Johansen is sly lingo for we may get sued by this actress for stealing her likeness
So they’re just doing a way shittier version of the movie “Her”?
It didn’t sound anything like her.
That’s not what the CEO of the company thought.
Wow, the media figured that out now? After what, 6 months since this has been public and for free?
