• Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That evolution is purely randomness + fitness landscape rather than that DNA guides the process at least somewhat. Don’t burn me alive guys

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        In the short term (single digit generations) that’s probably true, but I don’t see how it could be on longer scales. If the random mutations decrease fitness, they won’t be passed on at some point, since there is less reproduction. If they increase fitness, they will be passed on to more individuals.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          What OP said is Motoo Kimura’s Neutral Theory of evolution. There’s a lot of evidence supporting it. The vast majority of mutations have a negligible effect on fitness. So it is very possible that something may evolve purely by chance.