• pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I honestly never even considered that it was a slur. Sometimes you are having a discussion where gender identity is relevant, and in that situation it is useful to be able to clearly indicate that someone is cisgender.

    See I just used it.

    • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don’t think classifying cisgender as a slur is defendable, especially on its own.

      Not saying it is a slur, but I’ve seen it used like a slur before, mostly coupled with “white” and “men”/“women”. But I’m fairly sure Elon himself is against censoring language for that reason (when it comes to things that don’t personally offend him). It just seems dumb and hypocritical to me

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The word was created so the official opposite of transgender is not simply the word “normal”. Treating cisgender as a slur is just attacking transgender people.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      When I first heard it, I assumed it was a slur because the closest common use English word is cissy.

      But then I like… looked it up.

      Basically, I can understand how some folks initially think it’s a slur, but this conservative overreaction is clearly in bad faith and it’d almost certainly happen whatever the fuck the word was.