A top Hamas political official told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    Your mileage may vary.

    It does. I agree that Netanyahu has to go and Palestine should have the chance to be independend, but the Hamas has also to be put down for good. With those terrorist fucks and their degenerated supporters, there will be no peace in the middle east.

      • avater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        How did ‘Al Qaeda has to be put down for good’ work out for the U.S.?

        Not that bad since Osama and Zawahiri are dead. Their last big terrorist attack against America was when, 2010? Against the west in general, in France 2015? Since then they pretty much done or in a clash with the Taliban. If we can do the same with the Hamas, I would call it a win.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I see, so by ‘put down for good,’ you meant ‘still exists, just not doing anything dangerous to Israel at this moment.’

          Also, you know it took decades of war for Al Qaeda to get to that point, right?

          • avater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I see, so by ‘put down for good,’ you meant ‘still exists, just not doing anything dangerous to Israel at this moment.’

            Which is pretty desireable based on the current situation, right? Get rid of their leadership and cripple them.

            Also, you know it took decades of war for Al Qaeda to get to that point, right?

            No shit sherlock, but it’s also not like the conflict in the middle east just started in October…we are already a few years into it and it looks like a good point to get rid of their leadership for good now. That and a independend Palestine could make terrorists like them useless and maybe, just maybe could bring peace to the region. But with them still intact, I so ne future in this…

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              8 months ago

              I guess I’m very confused about the way you used term ‘put down for good’ to mean ‘made ineffective, but maybe only temporarily’ or why you think this conflict wouldn’t also take decades.

              Do you think when people have a pet put down, they actually send it to live on a farm upstate?

              • avater@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                22
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Yeah I guess there is no point in continuing this discussion here…and no I don’t think that Osama is on a farm right now, but maybe you do. And yes “made ineffective, but maybe only temporarily” is a desiable state for the current situation since it can pretty much mean that they are done. But like I said no point in discussing this any further with you ;)