• Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The company behind tik tok said they will not sell they America is only 20% of their global market. They have refused to give their source code.

    So guess app just won’t work in US. Dumb ass lawmakers only people this hurt are the US citizens that are using it to make money.

    • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d counter that basing your livelihood on an app that harvests your and your viewers data for an adversarial government known to use this kind of data in psyops isn’t a sound business idea.

      In fact, I’d say this bill actually protects American users who have been using the app.

      If TikTok can’t prove that they use our data responsibly, and refuse to do so to the point of just leaving the market, we are all better off. Another company will fill that void and content creators have endless options to move to.

      I don’t think “but people need to make money while our data is harvested and provided to a government that uses it against us” is a great argument.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        They passed the bill because someone is getting a cut. It isn’t to protect the public. If they wanted to protect the public we would have universal healthcare and a ban on guns.

        • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I disagree. I listened when it was presented to Congress. I read a good amount of the data justifying the required transfer. If you don’t think this bill protects the public, there really is no reasoning with you.

          Someone will get a cut specifically because TikTok chooses not to prove where their data flows. They had a choice, and chose to exit the market.

          But sure, you can frame it like we forced them to leave the market, which isn’t the case. They could have verified their data flow and remained if they were not abusing it.

              • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Can you at least try and clarify what in the hearings convinced you so much? I’ve seen some of these hearings. Some of them are complete BS political threater.

                I mean, what would you have liked to see that would’ve proved the data is treated exactly the same as every other American company that harvests our data?

                • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Lmao I must have struck a nerve to get 7 replies from you.

                  You keep returning to your red herring because you don’t actually have a decent argument.

                  I bet you’re really mad at some internet stranger, maybe you should take a break

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                Unrelated? We were talking about protecting the public and you are talking about a stupid fucking app where people learn dance moves from.

                Who are you brought to you by? Meta or Alphabet or Reddit or X?

                • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  What does the issue we are talking about (TikTok’s data harvesting) have to do with healthcare? Unless that’s where you get your magic crystal healing tips lmao

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    You said it was to protect the public. This is involved in protecting the public. You claim Congress did this to protect the public so I am asking you when your friends are going to really protect the public.

                    You can just admit that some Congress people got a cut to do this and it has nothing to do with protecting us against the big bad Asians. While we are on the topic I think it’s fucked up that the government, and it’s internet lackeys, want me to hate the Chinese.

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Another company will fill that void

        Yay, more YouTube and Instagram. What we always wanted. Can’t wait to have maybe one day Meta and Alphabet will combine so we can only have one service!

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s not how due process and liberal democracy works. The government has to prove you’re doing it. Setting any precedent that you have to prove you’re not doing something (an impossible task) is incredibly dangerous.

      • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s cute how you think that the only government that’s using our own data against us is china. Might want to step back and look at our own government, then apply your same line of thinking to all big tech companies in existence right now.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Exactly: banning TikTok is nothing more than a good start. We need to destroy Facebook, Twitter and Reddit next.

        • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          You’re extremely dull if youre suggesting I don’t know data is abused left and right all over the place. But if TikTok is so bad it’s can’t even fit within our abusive system, it deserves to transfer or exit.

          You’re missing the forest for the trees.

          • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            And you aren’t even reading what I wrote. In no post did I defend tiktok… I merely stated that what it is doing is also being done by american based companies and they should be addressed as well.

            • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              No doubt, but accountability starts somewhere, so why have a problem with this? Why not celebrate and then demand equitable action domestically?

              “I’m not defending TikTok. I’m just bemoaning action being taken against them because bad things happen with other companies!” Not a great look.

              • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Where did I say I had a problem with this? So much knee jerking in here. I am stating that lawmakers should apply these same laws to our own social media. The same lawmakers who will most likely profit off this decision.

                • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Then you should write and call those lawmakers. You are a part of the body that elects them. Or run for office and fight the good fight yourself.

                  I do hope we do get some domestic reform, but I’m able to separate this small foreign policy win from the huge need for comprehensive domestic policy.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                How about we start with universal healthcare and then we worry about children learning dancing, right here in River City

        • Shadywack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s cute how you think many of us haven’t applied that big thinking to all big tech. A Facebook, Snapchat, and Twitter ban absolutely should happen.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Nobody is gonna use a VPN to get their TikTok fix. They’ll use Facebook Reels or YouTube shorts, since most content creators cross-post their stuff there anyway.

        • Hubi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You need more than a handful of brain cells for that, so it’s not exactly the easily manipulated target audience of TikTok.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Passing a law to give the executive branch overreaching censorship authority over the internet while simultaneously campaigning that the other option in the next election wants to use the power of that office to overthrow democracy. This is the “good ending”.

        • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s almost like TikTok was given a chance to prove our data doesn’t flow to the Chinese government, and TikTok decided to exit the market than prove where their data flows.

          But sure, let’s just pretend we randomly forced them out with an executive overreach lmao

    • Shadywack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t see how anyone is hurt by losing access to Tiktok. The only sad part about this is that all social media isn’t banned.