• FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder how many of these lawmakers will be invested in the company that swoops in and saves the American public?

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Pathetic watching ancient, feeble rich people about to return to the dust from whence they came still frantically positioning to boost their ego scores.

        It’s as if they believe their preferred invisible sky mommy/daddy will accept a bribe of earthly currency.

      • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Don’t worry everyone, it’s just pelosi’s 3rd cousin doing the investing so that makes everything totally cool and totally legal.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Congressional Representatives and Senators are shielded from most insider trading laws. She could literately buy in, flip the SEC the bird, and go on her merry way.

    • Nurgle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Mnuchin (fmr Trump Treasury Sec) is already setting up a group to try and buy it apparently.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The company behind tik tok said they will not sell they America is only 20% of their global market. They have refused to give their source code.

      So guess app just won’t work in US. Dumb ass lawmakers only people this hurt are the US citizens that are using it to make money.

      • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d counter that basing your livelihood on an app that harvests your and your viewers data for an adversarial government known to use this kind of data in psyops isn’t a sound business idea.

        In fact, I’d say this bill actually protects American users who have been using the app.

        If TikTok can’t prove that they use our data responsibly, and refuse to do so to the point of just leaving the market, we are all better off. Another company will fill that void and content creators have endless options to move to.

        I don’t think “but people need to make money while our data is harvested and provided to a government that uses it against us” is a great argument.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          They passed the bill because someone is getting a cut. It isn’t to protect the public. If they wanted to protect the public we would have universal healthcare and a ban on guns.

          • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            I disagree. I listened when it was presented to Congress. I read a good amount of the data justifying the required transfer. If you don’t think this bill protects the public, there really is no reasoning with you.

            Someone will get a cut specifically because TikTok chooses not to prove where their data flows. They had a choice, and chose to exit the market.

            But sure, you can frame it like we forced them to leave the market, which isn’t the case. They could have verified their data flow and remained if they were not abusing it.

                • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Can you at least try and clarify what in the hearings convinced you so much? I’ve seen some of these hearings. Some of them are complete BS political threater.

                  I mean, what would you have liked to see that would’ve proved the data is treated exactly the same as every other American company that harvests our data?

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Unrelated? We were talking about protecting the public and you are talking about a stupid fucking app where people learn dance moves from.

                  Who are you brought to you by? Meta or Alphabet or Reddit or X?

        • Halosheep@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Another company will fill that void

          Yay, more YouTube and Instagram. What we always wanted. Can’t wait to have maybe one day Meta and Alphabet will combine so we can only have one service!

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s not how due process and liberal democracy works. The government has to prove you’re doing it. Setting any precedent that you have to prove you’re not doing something (an impossible task) is incredibly dangerous.

        • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s cute how you think that the only government that’s using our own data against us is china. Might want to step back and look at our own government, then apply your same line of thinking to all big tech companies in existence right now.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Exactly: banning TikTok is nothing more than a good start. We need to destroy Facebook, Twitter and Reddit next.

          • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You’re extremely dull if youre suggesting I don’t know data is abused left and right all over the place. But if TikTok is so bad it’s can’t even fit within our abusive system, it deserves to transfer or exit.

            You’re missing the forest for the trees.

            • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              And you aren’t even reading what I wrote. In no post did I defend tiktok… I merely stated that what it is doing is also being done by american based companies and they should be addressed as well.

              • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                No doubt, but accountability starts somewhere, so why have a problem with this? Why not celebrate and then demand equitable action domestically?

                “I’m not defending TikTok. I’m just bemoaning action being taken against them because bad things happen with other companies!” Not a great look.

                • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Where did I say I had a problem with this? So much knee jerking in here. I am stating that lawmakers should apply these same laws to our own social media. The same lawmakers who will most likely profit off this decision.

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  How about we start with universal healthcare and then we worry about children learning dancing, right here in River City

          • Shadywack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s cute how you think many of us haven’t applied that big thinking to all big tech. A Facebook, Snapchat, and Twitter ban absolutely should happen.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Nobody is gonna use a VPN to get their TikTok fix. They’ll use Facebook Reels or YouTube shorts, since most content creators cross-post their stuff there anyway.

          • Hubi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You need more than a handful of brain cells for that, so it’s not exactly the easily manipulated target audience of TikTok.

        • underisk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Passing a law to give the executive branch overreaching censorship authority over the internet while simultaneously campaigning that the other option in the next election wants to use the power of that office to overthrow democracy. This is the “good ending”.

          • stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s almost like TikTok was given a chance to prove our data doesn’t flow to the Chinese government, and TikTok decided to exit the market than prove where their data flows.

            But sure, let’s just pretend we randomly forced them out with an executive overreach lmao

      • Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t see how anyone is hurt by losing access to Tiktok. The only sad part about this is that all social media isn’t banned.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Healthcare? Nah, let’s fight about it for decades and never give people anything meaningful. Education? Nah, let’s make our people go neck deep into debt and still fight about it for decades. Ban TikTok? Hold my bribery, you got it. Gimme 24 hours and you got it, boss.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just as a reminder, we have been ‘fighting for 15’ since 2012. But when it comes to leveraging foreign companies with bans to force them to sell to US oligarchs we can move at blazing speed through the least functional congrss in recent history. There are two very different Americas depending on how much money you have.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    This comment section is astounding.

    If you think it’s good that congress passed a ban of a social media platform tied to a bill funding two foreign wars you’re either a fed or delusional.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Seriously. The real solution is comprehensive privacy protection and consumer information export controls for all companies operating within the US.

      This whole thing is just going to give an American company the capability to use Tik Tok to spy on people and control information, which is barely better.

      And then they’ll likely sell the data to China anyway. Data brokers exist and make a fuck ton of money on us.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        So you would be cool with ISIS rolling out a social media app? All profits go directly to making explosives. All user data, including biometrics is logged to help ISIS plan future terrorist attacks on American soil.

        Edit: sorry I misread what you are saying. But still, idk how you prevent China from using our data when that’s the whole point of China owning TikTok in the first place. A forced sale or ban is the only option.

        That’s an extreme example of course but I don’t think you can just ignore who makes products and where your money (and data in this case) is going. And yes, I don’t like American social media companies either. But you will remember that Facebook got into a ton of trouble for selling data to the Russians via Cambridge Analytica. At least we can try to prevent American companies from leaking data to hostile parties. Meanwhile we KNOW that TikTok is giving our data to the Chinese government and forcing a sale of the American branch of TikTok is the only thing we can do about it.

        • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          This won’t stop china from spying on us, they are already buying all they want from Meta, Twitter, Google, and Microsoft, they don’t need Tiktok to do this. Also, the chineese company that “owns” tiktok only owns about 40% of the company.

        • nieminen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The Chinese government already has our data thanks to Facebook, Google, and reddit (and just about every other free service). This ban (“forced sale” that will never happen because the US is only 10% of their revenue) is to limit our communication, not to save our data. They could pass legislation to protect our data across the board, but they (the house) have too much invested in meta and them to do anything to harm their bottom line.

          This ban only became the biggest most important thing for the government to do after we all started learning what Israel was doing in Gaza. Our house of reps is primarily owned by Israel and private corporations, and Tiktok is a driving force for change. It’s getting more young people to vote than anything before. And all they want is representation that actually represents, rather than cater to bribery. This idea is terrifying to those currently in power, because they’ve enjoyed doing almost nothing good for the American people for 4 decades while getting stupid rich at the same time.

          I understand a lot of people knew what was happening to the Palestinians for years, but that was information the US was happy to keep to itself. Tiktok made it super clear to the rest of us what was actually going on.

          I’m not trying to say data privacy isn’t important. It is, but the ship has sailed on that problem. We can do things to limit the damage to future users, but everyone that’s already been on the Internet… 🤷. This is an issue they have with US citizens learning about all the shady underhanded shit they’ve been doing for decades. If they were truly worried about our data privacy, meta and Google would be their first and primary targets, rather than the primary beneficiaries from a sale (because a sale would immediately ruin it) or ban.

          And finally (sorry, I know this is long), I’ve seen more anti Chinese information on Tiktok than anywhere else. If they were in control of what’s being shown (the government’s other big excuse here), you’d think they’d censor their past and current atrocities from being known. Everything I see on Tiktok doesn’t serve China at all. In fact if we’re finally able to vote out the dinosaurs and money whores that currently run things, then it may actually hurt China in the long run.

          Thanks for reading my ranting Ted talk. Sorry about that!

      • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It was never about American’s privacy, it was because the government apparently can’t control the narrative in the app while they can with the other one’s which is why they are trying to force tiktok to sell to an American company or gtfo. I have seen news faster and with more accuracy in the past 6 months on tiktok than even here, and when I try to see it on the media it’s either only one sided or completely absent (the farmers protests in Brussels and France is a great example, the zionist message in america and the college protests is another)

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I’m just pointing and laughing at the dopamine addicts. We’ve lost so many better internet things by now and the same people who thought I was weird for caring are now crying over tiktok.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      All three of these pieces of legislation are what a Real True American would support. If you refuse to endorse these bills, we’re going to have to note it on your social credit score.

        • nieminen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s been the American legacy for a very long time.

          Supporting Israel’s genocide is nothing I would have voted for given the choice.

          From what I understand of Ukraine’s situation, I’m happy to support them.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    If social media apps exist to slurp up as much user info as possible, and they do, then it makes sense to be concerned about the government that they’re subject to.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    I probably shouldnt be celebrating this but I am. I fucking despise Tiktok with a passion, I hate its users, its creators, I hate the short form content trend it started and its algorithm based content delivery systems that every other app copied but worse, I hate the sexualisation of minors and peddling that content to pedos, I hate the clout chasing in general, I hate tiktok trends and “challenged”. and I hate the general brainrot it has caused.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      What are you celebrating, exactly? TikTok isn’t going away, it’s just going to be sold to American investors.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        At the very least they will have to split tiktok since I doubt the CCP will let them sell the whole thing, nor will they want to.

        Best case scenario they pull out of the US entirely and then maybe some other western countries also ban it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hate its users, its creators, I hate the short form content trend it started and its algorithm based content delivery systems that every other app copied but worse

      I mean… eh? TikTok is hardly the first platform to embrace short-form video. I think the dislike for the app is overblown.

      The style is reflective of the medium. No point in making big budget audio/visual multi-hour immersive experiences for a cell phone screen with some headphones. The media has to be short because its for an audience that’s stealing time in the middle of a commute or during a break at school or the office. The continuous-feed style is something we just managed to achieve with high speed mobile internet (TikTok would have been impossible on a dial-up device).

      Its a young medium. People are still learning what works and what doesn’t. And its as prone to getting enshittified as every other venue, thanks to the endless need for higher profits.

      But as someone who grew up watching Albino Blacksheep and YTMND meme-tier content and owns a DVD of Super Bowl Commercials, I gotta say that we’ve had a lot worse.

      I hate the general brainrot it has caused

      People say this shit about every medium. And there’s definitely awful pieces of individual content.

      But a lot of it just comes down to the hyper-sensationalist marketing. And its common to every conceivable media, from Comic Book style front page of print to the “Bwooooong!” they put in every new movie trailer.

      If TikToks suck, its largely because they’re aping the worst aspects of all the other established media forms.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The media has to be short because its for an audience that’s stealing time in the middle of a commute or during a break at school or the offic

        Except most people you speak to will tell you they spend hours in bed scrolling. Short form took off because it drives higher engagement.

        And its as prone to getting enshittified as every other venue, thanks to the endless need for higher profits.

        Except its never not been shitty. I wa son it back when it was musical.ly it has much of the same problems.

        Albino Blacksheep and YTMND meme-tier content

        Which are far more creative than doing whatever the current trend is, or a thirst trap or click bait.

        People say this shit about every medium. And there’s definitely awful pieces of individual content.

        But with tiktok you can feel it. I hate short form but still end up scrolling mindlessly through YT shorts or IG reels. And it really does measurably affect your attention span. And it’s so noticeable that the user base openly acknowledges the brain rot.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          most people you speak to will tell you they spend hours in bed scrolling

          This seems like an exaggeration on a number of fronts. But even if you can find folks doing this, what’s the counterfactual? Would these same people be out hitting the gym or gardening or curing cancer? Or would they just be watching TV or reading a book, instead?

          Short form took off because it drives higher engagement.

          There are folks binging seasons worth of Netflix who would argue otherwise.

          Which are far more creative than doing whatever the current trend is

          They’re absolutely not. Go back through the dredges of the '00s-era content mill and you’ll find plenty of low-effort crap. Hell, YTMND was the pinacle of low effort crap. It was shit you could crank out in ten minutes with MS Paint and a collection of mp3 snippets.

          And it’s so noticeable that the user base openly acknowledges the brain rot.

          You’d have heard from folks reading tabloid news or watching reality TV decades ago.

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Would these same people be out hitting the gym or gardening or curing cancer? Or would they just be watching TV or reading a book, instead?

            I mean ive personally just zoned out scrolling short form and missed my chance to go to the gym before. obviously might not be the case for everyone but is certainly plausible.

            There are folks binging seasons worth of Netflix who would argue otherwise.

            That doesnt disprove what I said at all.

            They’re absolutely not. Go back through the dredges of the '00s-era content mill and you’ll find plenty of low-effort crap.

            Creativity != effort and even then most tiktok stuff is as low effort as it gets.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean ive personally just zoned out scrolling short form and missed my chance to go to the gym before.

              I’ve seen people scrolling in between reps at the gym. But, again, would this not have been a problem if you’d been blogging instead of TikToking? Or Netflix binging?

              That doesnt disprove what I said at all.

              Multi-hour tv series are not short form.

              Creativity != effort

              A picture of a celebrity attached to a quote from a movie played on a loop is neither.

              • gmtom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’ve seen people scrolling in between reps at the gym. But, again, would this not have been a problem if you’d been blogging instead of TikToking? Or Netflix binging?

                The point is short form content enables that behaviour more than other things. Its taken off specifically because its addicting and makes you think “its only a short/reel/tiktok just one more… okay one more…etc” that you dont get with hour long netflix episodes.

                Multi-hour tv series are not short form.

                No one is arguing otherwise and long form content just existing doesnt disprove that short form drives higher engagement. Its like saying “Taylor swift songs are the most popular” and replying “but ACDC exists?” That doesnt disprove the original statement.

                A picture of a celebrity attached to a quote from a movie played on a loop is neither.

                ok

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The point is short form content enables that behaviour more than other things. Its taken off specifically because its addicting and makes you think “its only a short/reel/tiktok just one more… okay one more…etc” that you dont get with hour long netflix episodes.

                  I simply haven’t seen anything to support this claim.

                  No one is arguing otherwise and long form content just existing doesnt disprove that short form drives higher engagement

                  You haven’t established anything to disprove. You’ve just asserted it with some personal anecdote about missing a gym appointment.

                  Its like saying “Taylor swift songs are the most popular” and replying “but ACDC exists?”

                  It’s like saying Taylor Swift isn’t inside the top 10 of the Billboard Top 100 so why do you keep insisting that her overwhelming popularity is corrupting America’s fragile young egos?

    • daltotron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hate the short form content trend it started

      always has been, with vine.

      its algorithm based content delivery systems that every other app copied but worse

      always has been, with twitter, facebook, instagram, snapchat, youtube, uhhhhh… vine, yeah, just mentioned that one. discord, tinder. literally everything.

      I hate the sexualisation of minors and peddling that content to pedos

      Look at what the great adpocalypse of youtube was ostensibly about, then look at what it was really about. In any case, always has been.

      I hate the clout chasing in general

      Always has been.

      I hate tiktok trends and “challenged”

      Assuming you mean “challenge”, you could check out the harlem shake, the ice bucket challenge, god, there’s a lot of them honestly. Gangnam style. I think probably this is just like, meme culture more broadly, which, say it with me now: always has been.

      I hate the general brainrot it has caused.

      And finally, always has been.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah but that’s just on YouTube and Facebook now. Nobody is going to regulate them in the slightest.

      It is a slap in the face if they want to say it is too influential to have an adversarial state control it, at the same time leaving it fine for local billionaires to do the exact same things.

    • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Me too. I see no issue with banning it. I’ve said this before, but people are only outraged because they’re addicted to it and may possibly lose it. Fuck tik tock. Among your examples, I will add the misinformation pounding left tok with things like autism and other mental disabilities. Plus, the way people are self diagnosing themselves and acting like it’s a fashion statement is outrageous. And then you have the outrage bait videos that explicitly cherry pick information for viewers while holding back the full context of things, which is a tactic there’s already far too much of in this country.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        pounding left tok with things like autism and other mental disabilities. Plus, the way people are self diagnosing themselves and acting like it’s a fashion statement is outrageous

        [Respectfully] fuck off.

        Anyone the bemoans “self diagnosis” is just a classist dickhead.

        • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Get the fuck over it. The self diagnosing bullshit on tick tok does more harm than good, so no, I don’t think I’ll “fuck off”. Couldn’t help but notice you glazed over the sentence I wrote and willfully ignored the misinformation part in an effort to make it look like i have an issue with disabled users. Classic. News flash, but as someone with 2 autistic children who were medically diagnosed, seeing this “put a finger up for x, if you have more than 3 fingers you are autistic” fad is absolutely bullshit self diagnosis being flaunted like its “cool” when they dont even have a medical diagnosis. I have nothing further to say to you. Have a nice day!

          • gmtom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Get the fuck over yourself mate.

            It’s really nice you have the money to get your kids diagnosed. But I really need you to pull your head out of your arse and realise that poor people exist and gasp they can be autistic too.

            It would cost me a month and half of wages to get an autism diagnosis, then another month and half of wages if I wanted and ADHD one as well.

            So can you maybe see why people sleep diagnose and don’t just get an “official” diagnosis?

            I mean you probably don’t given how much a conceited reprobate you are being over this.

            Willing to bet you’re one of these autism speaks parents as well.

            • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah bud, so anyway self diagnosing as a fashionable accessory is bullshit, and you can fuck off. It’s called insurance. It costs nothing to get diagnosed, and it’s not that hard to get state assistance, which I did, for their diagnosis, after fighting tooth and nail for 2 and a half years to get my children the help they needed. You clearly have no idea how this works, and I’m not going to go out of my way to explain it to you. Seeing people pretending to have autism (and some who straight up lied about having it-google it, I’m not doing it for you) when I fought so hard to get my kids their diagnosis simply infuriates me, and your spineless melodramatic bullshit isn’t helping . Since you’re going to sling insults at me because you don’t like my opinion, don’t expect me to respect you. Grow the fuck up, get off your ass, stop scrolling tik tok, and actually fight for your diagnosis instead of whining about how you can’t do it. I’m done wasting my time on you.

              • gmtom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                t’s called insurance. It costs nothing to get diagnosed

                Like I knew you were a dumbass and a piece of shit already but my god you just keep getting dumber. Do you think everyone has insurance, can afford insurance, has insurance that covers these kinds of diagnosis, can afford their deductible?

                2 and a half years to get my children the help they needed.

                Why did they need help? They werent diagnosed at the time right? So they werent actually autistic right? Or did you diagnose them yourself by observing their behaviour?

                Also, why did you have to fight so hard if its soooo easy to get a diagnosis? Or are you just bullshitting?

                You clearly have no idea how this works,

                Imma blow your mind here chief, so you have the USA right? Well theres actually things that exist outside of the USA. (crazy I know) entire countries in fact that have different ways of doing things like autism diagnosis. Im from one of those countries.

                nd I’m not going to go out of my way to explain it to you

                Well thats good since you clearly dont know wtf youre talking about anyway “iTs CalLeD iNsUrAnCe”

                . Seeing people pretending to have autism (and some who straight up lied about having it-google it, I’m not doing it for you) when I fought so hard to get my kids their diagnosis simply infuriates me

                So im going to ask you to rub your two braincells together and try to have a coherent thought for once. What do you think is worse? Entitled whiny babies like you being mildly annoyed by people you think are faking it? Or people that genuinely have autism getting harassed by losers like you and not being able to get the care they need.

                Like lets make it about you, since thats all people like you actually care about: It took you 2 years for you to get your kids diagnosed, even when you were “fighting tooth and nail” for it on their behalf. And in that time, they were still actually autistic and not getting the help they needed right? How would you feel about someone insisting theyre not actually autistic, and just pretending to get attention and trying to stop them from getting help until you jumped through all those hops? pretty shitty right? So can you imagine that it might be harder for an adult to make that fight on their own? especially when theyre battling with their own Autism or ADHD? So it might take them even longer than 2 years to get a diagnosis?

                ince you’re going to sling insults at me because you don’t like my opinion,

                Im not slinging insults at you because I dont like your opinion. Im slinging insults at you because you’re a fucking disgraceful excuse for a human being with no compassion for anyone outside of your own life. And im fucking dismayed that you’re going to raise so kids to be exactly as vile of cunt as you are. Those kids deserve better than that. and I would have put my arguments in a nicer way to actually try and convince so, since I do know insulting someone makes them resist change harder, but it was apparent from your first comment that you have your head so far up your own arse that would never listen to a reasonable argument, so I might as well tell you how much a fucking piece of shit you are.

                Grow the fuck up, get off your ass, stop scrolling tik tok, and actually fight for your diagnosis instead of whining about how you can’t do it. I’m done wasting my time on you.

                Again, not like you care because you very very clearly only think about yourself and have a low key disdain for the poor and neurodivergent, but I have a full time job which is difficult for me (because you know ADHD and autism) and takes up pretty much all of my time and energy and leaves me with very little disposable income, yet I do actually save what I can and a formal diagnosis is one of the things im saving for, but putting together over 3 months salary for it is a tall order that will actually take me at least 3-4 years, and thats assuming prices dont rise further and I dont incur any other big expenses like a car breakdown.

                Im sure thats a foreign concept to a classist piece of shit like you, but its the reality the millions upon millions of neurodivergent people face. And if you had literally a SIGNLE IOTA of empathy or compassion in you heart, you would be able to acknowledge it.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    Will there be a TikTok dance on TikTok that covers this event?

  • whalebiologist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It seems like a lot of people think moves like this are about actual national security like congress claims,

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean to an extent it is. America is mad China has a platform that’s popular with Americans that they can’t control. The effects of this were shown with the fact that America couldn’t control the narrative over the Israel-Palestine issue after October 7th. So to increase national security and try to gain back the control they had they’re getting rid of TikTok.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I agree that the government attempting to have this kind of control in a democracy is wrong but it still does provide national security. Security is good but can be taken too far and in all honestly we’ve been very far past what’s too far for a while with stuff like the Patriot act.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nooooo only I should collect data of the entire world!

    They never got over Snowden.

    • nytrixus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      And they never will. They’re so not over Snowden that, an Ex-CIA computer engineer was handed 40 years for giving spy agency secrets to Wikileaks.

      So, no, anything that reminds the US of Snowden, they get salty very quick.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have mixed feelings. Like I’m glad we’re funding Ukraine, angry we’re finding Israel, and mixed about TikTok. I dislike the app, but that’s no reason to ban something. I think all social media has the issues associated with it except one: a foreign country controls the algorithm. Also this is standard policy for foreign companies in China and turnabout is fair play.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      TikTok is nothing but a chinese psyop program to see how they can influence the public.

      And boy howdy did it work, Look at all the absolutely monstrous, horrible shit people did in pursuit of tiktok trends and fame.

        • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sorry what? Where the fuck where people doing Internet challenges before tiktok? Oh yeah, FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE.

          People have been doing all kinds of stupid shit online seeking internet clout way before tiktok was even musicly (or whatever it was called)

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          I like how you completely ignored the bulk of my statement just to make a pithy comment that is only relevant by ignoring the most important part of my post.

          That really makes you look cool, and have a big penis.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            I did address the bulk of your statement, which is that the app is supposedly being used to influence people. What else is there to address? Your goofy “chinese psyop program” talking point which amounts to nothing more than scaremongering?

      • Aermis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wtf are you talking about. I’ve been sparsely browsing tiktok since it’s creation and have no idea about any monstrous horrible things people did or see anything relating to some psyop program.

        • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You are not going to convince anyone here, I’m with you on that but over here all people care about it “not fediverse = bad” so you and I will get downvoted when speaking any rationale that doesn’t put tiktok as the devil’s spawn

          • Aermis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ahh so the same ol reddit hive mind I wanted to leave behind. Just in another cultish direction, creating a meta of what and who is “right” and “wrong” while interacting here with the stupid use of the upvote/down vote system. What absolute social media garbage lemmy is going to turn into.