I noticed that Quad 9 is not able to respond to the spy.pet query:

$ dig spy.pet @9.9.9.9 +short
;; communications error to 9.9.9.9#53: timed out

But Cloudflare DNS is able to do it:

$ dig spy.pet @1.1.1.1 +short
104.26.0.165
104.26.1.165
172.67.74.73

And to be sure, I checked another domain with the same TLD to rule out the option that Quad9 is unable to handle the .pet TLD, but I received a correct answer…

$ dig hello.pet @9.9.9.9 +short
3.64.163.50

Does Quad9 censor DNS queries?

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t all providers have the ability to filter things?

    Personally I have very few problems with DNS providers filtering out malware, that sounds like a benefit to me.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t all providers have the ability to filter things?

      It depends on what you can consider “the ability”. If by ability you mean have to deploy a team of engineers working for a week to make it happens, that’s okay, if they’ve their system built for it things are different.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I can do this in like 5 seconds with my PiHole and not only am I not a network engineer, I would encourage people to never employ me as such.

        So for an actual business that has a bigger budget than me ($0) and more hours to devote to it than me (.02), shouldn’t it be less of a problem?

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I can do this in like 5 seconds with my PiHole and not only am I not a network engineer,

          Exactly and consider Cloudflare for instance, adding an “if domain block” is easy but then once you’ve thousands of servers running the same piece of software across the globe deploying updates and features becomes way slower and way harder. You’ve to consider tests, regressions, a way to properly store and sincronize the blocklists across nodes etc…

          I’m not saying it can be done, because it can. But it will take longer and it will be a problem for someone. Besides you only have that point and click interface in your PiHole that allows you to do it in .02 because someone spend a few hours developing the feature. :)