Please explain my confused me like I’m 5 (0r 4 or 6).

  • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    It depends which calendar you use! Every calendar picks a basically arbitrary system to uniquely identify each year, and in some of them “year 0” doesn’t refer to any year.

    The Gregorian, for example, goes directly from 1 BC to 1 AD, since 1 BC is “the first year before Christ” and 1 AD is “the first in the years of our lord.” This doesn’t make much mathematical sense, but it’s not like there was a year that didn’t happen–they just called one year 1 BC, and the next year 1 AD.

    ISO 8601 is based on the Gregorian calendar, but it includes a year 0. 1 BC is the same year as +0000; thus 2 BC is -0001, and all earlier years are likewise offset by 1 between the two calendars.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes. They skipped right over. It confused many people at the time: a whole year of their lives, gone. Many centuries later when zero was invented, an explanation was finally offered as to why that happened.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      For those who don’t know, the concept of zero wasn’t discovered until the sixth century in India, and then either transferred or rediscovered in about the eighth century in Arabia.

  • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Years exist. We decide what to call them. You and I agree to call this year 2024, but that’s only an agreement. Some people call this year 5784.

    We call the system we use “The Gregorian Calendar”, because of a Pope named Gregory. That system is mostly the same as “The Julian Calendar”, with some important changes to make the calendar match the changing of the seasons better. In the Julian calendar, they decided to count the years starting from when they thought Jesus was born. They chose his birth year to be “The first year of our Lord”. We call that “year 1” for short.

    The people who created that system (the Julian Calendar) didn’t understand 0. The year before “The first year of our Lord” was called “The first year before the birth of Christ”. We now call these “AD 1” (“anno domini”, because Latin) and “1 BC” (“before Christ”). Since they didn’t understand 0, they didn’t call any year “0”. We have kept the tradition, because reasons.

    Some other systems have relabeled the year before “AD 1” as year 0, but that’s not how the Gregorian Calendar works, and that’s the calendar that you and I have been taught to use.

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      “They,” i.e. the catholic church, or whoever was tasked with coming up with a calendar, absolutely understood the concept of zero in the 1500’s. Yes, Zero took a bit longer to formalize and enter the zeitgeist of the public consciousness, but this myth of zero being some kind of unknowable thing for thousands of millennia is naive.

      I’d go so far as to say that a year zero in a calendar is useless. There should be a starting point of course, but calling it yero zero instead of year 1 is dumb.

      • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        By that part, I was referring to the people establishing the Julian Calendar, not the Gregorian. I’ve edited my comment to clarify that.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          But you are missing the point,. There is no reason to ever start a calendar at year zero. The starting point can be zero, fine, but once the first day goes by, you are in the first day of year 1, not year zero and that is logical and has nothing to do with smart astronomers etc, “not understanding the number zero.”

          At this point I’d say the only person who doesn’t understand zero is you.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Probably worth noting that the Gregorian Calendar was an invention of the 16th Century. It was invented to deal with the problems of the Julian Calendar and the creators would have had a firm understanding of the concept of zero. The AD/BC split was all about the assumed year of the birth of Jesus of Nazareth (according to Christian mythology). The year of his birth was set as the first year Anno Domini or “The year of the Lord”. Or the first year where Jesus was kicking about. The year prior to that would therefore be the first year before “Before Christ” was alive, and therefore the year 1 BC.

  • juliebean@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    i hope all these conflicting answers in the comments have made you less confused, OP.

  • lyth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Years are ordinal numbers, the kind of number that tells you which place you finished in a race, and as such cannot have zeroes or negatives. You’re living in the 2,024th year since the instant that began the Common Era. “0th” and “-1st” are not valid expressions for years for the same reason that you can’t place 0th in the Olympics

  • diverging@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    The anno domini (AD) dating system started in 525. The concept of zero did not make it to Europe until the 11th century.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The switch to the current system of using the theoretical birth of Jesus as the start of our calendar occurred in the 6th century, 500 years after the fact. They picked a year based on what evidence they had for when the birth of Jesus occurred with a margin of error of about ~30 years.
    When this occurred and we started observing years in Anno Domini, whatever local calendar was being used was immediately replaced by the year 525, and retroactively everything before that was assigned it’s proper year. This ends with AD 1 and directly starts with BC 1 going the other direction. No year 0 was observed in this switch.

    • brianorca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Also note that before this switch, years were often designated in relation to the founding of a city or by the start of a ruler’s reign. There were always ordinal numbers, so the first year of a reign would be year 1, and there was never a zero, because it was year X of a previous reign.

  • wellDuuh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    like I’m 5 (0r 4 or 6).

    Okay then.

    Before dawn of technology advancements that we have today, people did stuff in a very different manner, for the sake of this explanation, I will call it “primitive”

    As brilliant as human beings are, they often forget little things (little because may not have higher priority at that particular time) and dates is one of them.

    Even now, if you happen to forget today’s date, and do not have means for referring that (like looking at your smartphone or watch, some digital billboards and whatnot),

    what you would naturally do is refer back/forward, to the closest (recent/upcoming) date and day where a memorable event occurred/will occur. Events like your cousin’s birthday, trump impeachment, the coming football derby or the coming elections date. then you start counting with your fingers towards/backwards to the current day. This is “primitive”

    These variations of calendars that currently exist today have their own sort of “memorable event”.

    The most widely used today is AFTER CHRIST (AD). (Of which, to go back past that, they should have used count backwards tactic, i.e. -1, -2, -3, -4; Eg: -4AD; but instead, -4AD becomes 4BC which is BEFORE CHRIST. That is why counting forwards in BC, number decreases 😏 )

    To answer your question;

    “Year zero” is the year where that particular memorable event occurred.

    But as I demonstrated above, we use that year as a reference to count forward/backwards the following/past years.

  • Vub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, in our calendar system there was year 1 BC followed by year 1 AD. So no zero. It’s just how they set it up, they’re human made ideas anyway. Many countries do not even use this system, for example it is currently year 2567 in Thailand and year 113 in North Korea.